  |
BATTLE OF PHILADELPHIA
What happens when religions disagree? One little-known case from American history
illustrates the dangers of having ANY religious exercise mandated in our public
schools...
There is a piece of American history -- American religious history -- which school
prayer advocates do not choose to mention. This concerns the infamous "Bible wars"
which erupted in Philadelphia. Madalyn Murray O'Hair discussed this obscure event in
her book Freedom Under Siege:
"When the Roman Catholics themselves would not provide enough schools, the Catholic
church turned to fight the public schools where the Catholic children were in
attendance. Some people today even credit our now totally secular schools to the fact
that the Roman Catholic church fought so vigorously for the removal of all the
religious matter in the curriculum which might be interpreted as adverse reflection on
Catholicism. Conversely, rather than have an intrusion of Roman Catholic doctrines,
the Protestants agreed to secularize the schools. During the nineteenth century,
then, both the Protestants and the Roman Catholics feared the influence of secular
education on the faith and morals of the young people, but they each, equally, feared
the theological supremacy of the other more.
"The road to secularization, however, was not free of difficulties or even violence.
In 1844, for instance, at the urging of the local bishop, the Philadelphia school
board permitted Roman Catholic children in the public schools to read from their own
version of the Bible, the Douay Version. The American Protestant Association was
outraged. Mass meetings were held, two Roman Catholic churches were burned, and the
rioting was stopped only when the bishop ordered all his churches closed. At the
church of St. Philip Neri several people were killed. The church was broken open and
only the presence of the militia, the mayor and the governor prevented its being
burned to the ground..."
Numerous other confrontations followed this incident, as competing religious sects
fought over the content of school prayers or other religious instruction in public
schools. In 1854, for instance, a mob attacked a Roman Catholic priest in Maine after
he urged his followers to seek legal remedies against mandatory Protestant verse in
the state's public schools. Fifteen years later, in 1869 there were similar confrontations in
Cincinnati when Roman Catholic parents went to court in order to remove their children
from religious exercises in the city's school system.
Especially in today's diverse culture, there seems to be little or no agreement about
the exact content of the prayers which should be recited in public schools. Although
fundamentalist Christians are leading the school prayer effort, many Protestant groups
are skeptical, and consider the proposal a threat to religious liberty. Atheists
rightly point out that any prayer violates the rights of students who have no
religious beliefs.
Could we expect a repeat of the "Bible Wars"? Jews, Muslims and other religious
minorities in the United States are already clamoring for "equal access" on behalf of
displays and religious events in the public square. New age cults, voodoooists,
satanists, spiritualists -- all can insist on having their prayers, holy books and
ceremonies incorporated into the activities of our public schools.
A modern day version of the "Bible War" can only divide communities, and fragment
parents, teachers, school boards and ultimately the students. Rather than teach
values and morals, school prayer could result in confrontations over who -- and what
-- is considered "holy". It can balkanize students into competing religious factions,
and isolate the many students who have no religious beliefs whatsoever.
Religious faith -- or the lack of it -- should be a private affair. Public schools
should not be forums on behalf of religious indoctrination of any kind. Rather than
risk a twentieth century version of the "Bible Wars", communities should instead promote
genuine tolerance, and ensure that schools remain educational institutions, not bully
pulpits.
|
|