Now, my blood is boiling. Check out this report from CNN on the terror plot in New York:

(CNN) — Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday that Times Square bombing suspect Faisal Shahzad has admitted involvement in what authorities have now labeled an attempted terrorist attack.

Holder said that the Justice Department anticipates charging Shahzad “with an act of terrorism,” among other things.

“It is clear that this was a terrorist plot,” Holder said. It could have caused “death and destruction in the heart of New York City.”

FBI Deputy Director John Pistole said Shahzad was on the federal “no fly” list, which helped lead to Customs and Border Protection agents arresting him Monday night on a plane preparing to depart New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport.

Read more

This article talks in depth about this guy’s trip to Dubai via Islamabad, his cell phone, his car, the cameras that caught him on tape, and bears NO MENTION of his Muslim ties. None. As if Islam is not relevant in this picture.

The one mention of Islam is that “backlashes won’t be tolerated”. This, my friends, is crap. How much crap do we have to take from terrorists before we fight back? How many Americans have to die on our soil before we say ENOUGH with political correctness?

Why are the Obama and Bloomberg administrations going so far out of their way to be nice to thugs and barbarians? Last I knew, we were a strong nation that took crap from nobody. Now, we are actually CAUSING MORE TERRORISM by not fighting it where it lives — in the mosque.

LONDON (RNS) A top British judge has ruled that Christian beliefs have no standing under secular law because they lack evidence and cannot be proven.

Lord Justice John Grant McKenzie Laws made the declaration on Thursday (April 29) in throwing out a defamation suit by Christian relationship counselor who refused to offer sex therapy to gay couples.

Gary McFarlane protested that he was fired because offering sex therapy to same-gender couples violates his Christian principles.

But Laws said “religious faith is necessarily subjective, being incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence.” He added that to use the law to protect “a position held purely on religious grounds cannot therefore be justified.”

No religious belief, said the judge, can be protected under the law “however long its tradition, however rich its culture.”

In a 5-4 decision, the court said a federal judge was wrong to invalidate a federal law that authorized transfer of the land on which the cross sits to a private party. The cross is located in the Mohave National Preserve in California.

Read more

This is the main reason we want and need to keep an eye on the Supreme Court, not only in our votes, but also in our lawsuits.

It is now OK for a government entity to sell a piece of its land to a private group, and for that private group to erect a religious icon on that piece of land.

This does not end here. This is part of a larger plan now in play to place as many religious icons on public land as possible. You will soon see this happening in schools and courtrooms, and there is little we can do to stop it right now.

Unless we can find a school to sell US a piece of land, where we can post something…