Droste Verlag publishing has halted the printing of a new novel tentatively titled To Whom Honor is Due for fear of Islamic backlash. Felix Droste stated, “After the Mohamed cartoons, one knows that one can’t publish sentences or drawings that defame Islam without expecting a security risk.”
We all remember the backlash from the cartoons that depicted Mohamed, which were published in Denmark in 2005 and intentionally spread across the Islamic world with additional inflammatory cartoons that were not part of the original publication. This was done by Islamic clerics with the intent of fanning the flames and causing violent unrest: and it worked.
Of course, this is not the first thing to fall victim to fears of Islamic retaliation. Random House decided against printing The Jewel of Medina in 2008. A German theater canceled a play in 2006, which showed Mohamed getting beheaded. Yale University refused to reprint the Mohamed cartoons on the anniversary of their publishing in Denmark.
Gabriele Brinkmann, the author of To Whom Honor Is Due stated, “It’s a scandal for a publisher to tuck its tail between its legs. This is anticipatory obedience.”
Obedience to who or what: the fear of Islamic retaliation. Islamists are proving the point that Islam is a violent religion. Critics can say that suicide bombings are more political or cultural-based instead of religious-based, but when it comes to the Islamists’ reactions to the printing of Mohamed or criticism (AKA blasphemy) of Islam, there is no denying that religion is the key player in the violence.
With Muslims rallying in London carrying signs that said “Behead those that mock Islam” and “Slay those that mock Mohamed,” no wonder publishers, playwrights, directors, and politicians are running scared: afraid their building will be blown up, assets destroyed, employees killed, etc.
But wait… Droste is trying to have it both ways. He is worried about the security risk, as evidenced by his statement above, but then he turns around and says he was primarily motivated by a desire to respect all religions. He then goes on to say that he plans on publishing a honor killing book next year and that this particular book will not be published because of a single sentence.
What sentence is that? One of the characters in the book says, “You can shove the Koran up your ass.”
Of course that would offend Muslims, but what wouldn’t? Why should we be worried about offending Muslims and fear their retaliation? Their retaliatory and violent streak simply proves the point of the critics.
Nonie Darwish, who is the author of Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implication of Islamic Law said it best, “I am often amazed by Muslims who are offended by criticism of Islam but at the same time curse and encourage jihad and violence against Jews, Christians and non-Muslims. If Muslims want respect from others they must remove the tons of commandments to violence against others.”
After I posted a link to the story on Facebook, Eric Husby said, “For every book like this that gets metaphorically burned by the mob of murderers 10 more should be written. Take every opportunity to blaspheme Islam. Give it the zero respect it deserves. In fact, give it the scorn, ridicule, contempt and derision it deserves.”
I agree Eric. I agree completely.
Posted by Blair Scott
EDIT 10/22/09: The author of the book contacted me to let me know that the sentence I quoted is incorrect:
“The right sentence is: “You can shove the Koran…” then the character is interrupted by another who says: “Shut up! That’s enough!”
She also advises that she found a publisher and the book will be published.
To me, this makes the refusal to print the book even worse, as the insult is insinuated, but never completed.