Comments on: Membership Fees Reduced! http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced A Blog of Atheist Thought Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:25:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: what http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106525 what Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:22:48 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106525 Blair And what is the topic at hand? And where should it lead? Apparently certain topics are off-limits. Blair

And what is the topic at hand? And where should it lead? Apparently certain topics are off-limits.

]]> By: DaRatBastid http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106514 DaRatBastid Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:29:16 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106514 thanx! you'll see my $20 in the snail mail. thanx! you’ll see my $20 in the snail mail.

]]> By: DaRatBastid http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106513 DaRatBastid Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:07:35 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106513 Is that all you have phreeanderthal? OK, history lesson for you: Harding, Coolidge, HOOVER. All three ascribed to conservative fiscal policy that, in the end, destroyed the American economy and led to the great depression. The Smoot-Hawley tariff was just the final nail in the coffin. Now go back to watching Faux News and get lied to some more. Hopefully you'll be dead soon so your offspring can't hear you spew your bullshit, and the world won't have to repeat history. Again. Is that all you have phreeanderthal? OK, history lesson for you: Harding, Coolidge, HOOVER. All three ascribed to conservative fiscal policy that, in the end, destroyed the American economy and led to the great depression. The Smoot-Hawley tariff was just the final nail in the coffin.
Now go back to watching Faux News and get lied to some more. Hopefully you’ll be dead soon so your offspring can’t hear you spew your bullshit, and the world won’t have to repeat history.
Again.

]]> By: Krystalline Apostate http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106507 Krystalline Apostate Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:23:52 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106507 Blair - more often than not (in fact, all the time!), What & I disagree quite strongly & forcefully about Israel. Chances are very strong that we'll never agree. I can tell you this: I am a staunch supporter of Israel. However, it does seem that we see little criticism of Jews (especially the Madoff scandal) on this blog. It took me a while, but David does seem to skim over the news items regarding Jews. I can also tell you that I don't think What is an anti-semite: godless sodomite most definitely <i>is</i>, & in spades. In fact, GS can be quite accurately labeled a <b>hater</b>. Blair – more often than not (in fact, all the time!), What & I disagree quite strongly & forcefully about Israel. Chances are very strong that we’ll never agree. I can tell you this: I am a staunch supporter of Israel.
However, it does seem that we see little criticism of Jews (especially the Madoff scandal) on this blog. It took me a while, but David does seem to skim over the news items regarding Jews.
I can also tell you that I don’t think What is an anti-semite: godless sodomite most definitely is, & in spades. In fact, GS can be quite accurately labeled a hater.

]]> By: what http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106502 what Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:30:39 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106502 Blair <blockquote> I challenge you to send me one legitimate story that does not come from a racist propaganda site, does not contain conspiracy theories by morons, and does not mention the debunked “Elders of Zion.” C’mon… now is your chance to show the rest of the Blog that you’re not a stupid Neo-Nazi. Can you do it? </blockquote> In a recent discussion with KA on these pages on pointed out religious jews involved in supporting Madoff's ponzi scheme. These criminals, their behavior and their religion were no more and no less intertwined than the countless, and usually insignificant, bad behavior of xians and muslims that Dave blogs about with gusto. But their is no mention about the catastrophic bad behavior of these jews. When Israel recently attacked Gaza, an event which Dave admitted was religiously motivated, all he had to say about it was that he would not want to vacation there. This was an extremely significant news story and very consequential to the lives of many but it got no attention from Dave. Dave did find time to blog about a single arab (we don't even know that he is muslim) TV executive that beheaded his wife. How much more obvious does Dave's bias have to be? Blair

I challenge you to send me one legitimate story that does not come from a racist propaganda site, does not contain conspiracy theories by morons, and does not mention the debunked “Elders of Zion.” C’mon… now is your chance to show the rest of the Blog that you’re not a stupid Neo-Nazi. Can you do it?

In a recent discussion with KA on these pages on pointed out religious jews involved in supporting Madoff’s ponzi scheme. These criminals, their behavior and their religion were no more and no less intertwined than the countless, and usually insignificant, bad behavior of xians and muslims that Dave blogs about with gusto. But their is no mention about the catastrophic bad behavior of these jews.

When Israel recently attacked Gaza, an event which Dave admitted was religiously motivated, all he had to say about it was that he would not want to vacation there. This was an extremely significant news story and very consequential to the lives of many but it got no attention from Dave. Dave did find time to blog about a single arab (we don’t even know that he is muslim) TV executive that beheaded his wife.

How much more obvious does Dave’s bias have to be?

]]> By: what http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106500 what Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:18:59 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106500 Blair "Jew hater"? You can't follow the simple argument I am making in regards to Dave's bias so you pull out the "jew hater" crap. Is that an example of your "mature" behavior? Blair

“Jew hater”? You can’t follow the simple argument I am making in regards to Dave’s bias so you pull out the “jew hater” crap. Is that an example of your “mature” behavior?

]]> By: what http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106499 what Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:15:29 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106499 Blair <blockquote> I have over 50 different Google News Alerts set up and I have only received a couple in over a year, and both of those were innocuous, and one was about the Holocaust Museum. </blockquote> Yet, as one recent example, you (and Dave) missed these front page New York Times stories: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/nyregion/16jail.html?ref=nyregion http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/12/nyregion/12jail.html?ref=nyregion <blockquote> How come every time I make an offer to people like you, </blockquote> And just who are "people like me". <blockquote> Is it because you cannot adhere to my rules of nothing from racist propaganda sites and conspiracy theory wingnuts? </blockquote> Excuse me. When have I ever posted anything from a "racist propaganda sites and conspiracy theory wingnuts"? Put-up our shut-up with your nasty allegations! <blockquote> Or you could have taken the mature approach and taken me up on my offer. C’est la vie! </blockquote> I have pointed out on these pages on numerous occasions the bias Dave shows in choosing what he blogs about. I have linked to many news worthy stories involving the bad behavior by religious jews that have been completely overlooked on the pages of the NoGodBlog. So, you would like me to send you an email. To what purpose? I can point out the bias to you alone in an email - which may or may not be addressed by AA - or I can point it out on this blog to fellow atheists and members of AA. Which course of action do you think is more effective? Which course of action is more open? Blair
I have over 50 different Google News Alerts set up and I have only received a couple in over a year, and both of those were innocuous, and one was about the Holocaust Museum.

Yet, as one recent example, you (and Dave) missed these front page New York Times stories:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/nyregion/16jail.html?ref=nyregion
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/12/nyregion/12jail.html?ref=nyregion

How come every time I make an offer to people like you,

And just who are “people like me”.

Is it because you cannot adhere to my rules of nothing from racist propaganda sites and conspiracy theory wingnuts?

Excuse me. When have I ever posted anything from a “racist propaganda sites and conspiracy theory wingnuts”? Put-up our shut-up with your nasty allegations!

Or you could have taken the mature approach and taken me up on my offer. C’est la vie!

I have pointed out on these pages on numerous occasions the bias Dave shows in choosing what he blogs about. I have linked to many news worthy stories involving the bad behavior by religious jews that have been completely overlooked on the pages of the NoGodBlog. So, you would like me to send you an email. To what purpose? I can point out the bias to you alone in an email – which may or may not be addressed by AA – or I can point it out on this blog to fellow atheists and members of AA. Which course of action do you think is more effective? Which course of action is more open?

]]> By: Blair Scott http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106498 Blair Scott Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:02:01 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106498 <strong>what:</strong> Speaking for myself I will once again ask the question: Do you think religion is dangerous? If so than what aspect of religion makes it so? Your question is irrelevant to the topic at hand. I am not going to be side-tracked any more than this thread already has. what: Speaking for myself I will once again ask the question: Do you think religion is dangerous? If so than what aspect of religion makes it so?

Your question is irrelevant to the topic at hand. I am not going to be side-tracked any more than this thread already has.

]]> By: Blair Scott http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106497 Blair Scott Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:58:20 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106497 <strong>what: </strong>comments should reflect the official positions of AA." Only when annotated. It should be obvious that Dave has some leeway to allow his personality come through on his posts, such as his jab earlier about "Jews suck" toward you. Those of us that represent AA are not robots. <strong>what: </strong>"His comments should not show tribally motivated favoritism toward a particular religion. To compare his comments with mine shows a great lack of awareness of the importance of Dave’s position within AA." Only in your mind. <strong>what: </strong>"Is AA losing members?" Nope. If you can't stand Dave as much as you say and you think there is a bias, etc, etc., then why the hell are you here other than to stir crap up when you can? Live every other Jew-hater in the past, when I've offered a legitimate chance to redeem yourself (either with data or legitimate news stories) you refuse to comply or come up with stupid excuses to avoid it. I challenge you to send me one legitimate story that does not come from a racist propaganda site, does not contain conspiracy theories by morons, and does not mention the debunked "Elders of Zion." C'mon... now is your chance to show the rest of the Blog that you're not a stupid Neo-Nazi. Can you do it? what: comments should reflect the official positions of AA.”

Only when annotated. It should be obvious that Dave has some leeway to allow his personality come through on his posts, such as his jab earlier about “Jews suck” toward you. Those of us that represent AA are not robots.

what: “His comments should not show tribally motivated favoritism toward a particular religion. To compare his comments with mine shows a great lack of awareness of the importance of Dave’s position within AA.”

Only in your mind.

what: “Is AA losing members?”

Nope.

If you can’t stand Dave as much as you say and you think there is a bias, etc, etc., then why the hell are you here other than to stir crap up when you can?

Live every other Jew-hater in the past, when I’ve offered a legitimate chance to redeem yourself (either with data or legitimate news stories) you refuse to comply or come up with stupid excuses to avoid it.

I challenge you to send me one legitimate story that does not come from a racist propaganda site, does not contain conspiracy theories by morons, and does not mention the debunked “Elders of Zion.” C’mon… now is your chance to show the rest of the Blog that you’re not a stupid Neo-Nazi. Can you do it?

]]> By: Blair Scott http://atheists.org/blog/2009/06/29/membership-fees-reduced/comment-page-1#comment-106494 Blair Scott Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:52:23 +0000 http://atheists.org/blog/?p=1778#comment-106494 <strong>what:</strong> "I am not going to send you an email. These stories aren’t hidden. They are in plane view." I have over 50 different Google News Alerts set up and I have only received a couple in over a year, and both of those were innocuous, and one was about the Holocaust Museum. How come every time I make an offer to people like you, you never follow through? Is it because you cannot adhere to my rules of nothing from racist propaganda sites and conspiracy theory wingnuts? You had your chance. My offer was legitimate. <strong>what: </strong>"Instead I will continue to point out Dave’s bias in choosing stories and his comments about such stories." Or you could have taken the mature approach and taken me up on my offer. C'est la vie! what: “I am not going to send you an email. These stories aren’t hidden. They are in plane view.”

I have over 50 different Google News Alerts set up and I have only received a couple in over a year, and both of those were innocuous, and one was about the Holocaust Museum.

How come every time I make an offer to people like you, you never follow through? Is it because you cannot adhere to my rules of nothing from racist propaganda sites and conspiracy theory wingnuts?

You had your chance. My offer was legitimate.

what: “Instead I will continue to point out Dave’s bias in choosing stories and his comments about such stories.”

Or you could have taken the mature approach and taken me up on my offer. C’est la vie!

]]>