When they ask “What Harm Does Religion Cause?” Show them this.
How discouraging it is to see a compete idiot like this telling us in an official capacity that we need not worry about Environmental issues because the invisible Magic Man-in-the-sky will destroy the world when he sees fit. Imagine the damage this moron could cause!
This entry was posted
on Thursday, April 16th, 2009 at 3:18 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
54 Responses to “When they ask “What Harm Does Religion Cause?” Show them this.”
I think there is some truth in what NotSoSmart said. There is a balance in nature, but, the proof you seek will not be forthcoming, because, he like the rest of the Al Gores of the world assume that balance is stable, which is an obvious scientific absurdity. It is estimated that ninety five percent of all the species that ever existed on this planet are now extinct. While its true that if you kill off coyotes the rabbit population booms, because an existing balance is disturbed, it’s also true that if you killed all the rabbits, the coyotes would disappear as well.
They talk about global warming. Duhhhh! If the Earth wasn’t getting warmer, we’d still be in the Ice Age, when half of Europe was under a huge glacier. I read a geneticist’s theory that at the end of the Ice Age, there were about twenty reproducing human females on the planet. We were that close to becoming part of the fossil record that no one would have ever dug up. Had we gone the way of the dodo bird, the planet would be a different place, because, it cannot be denied that we pump poison into the air and water, and our population is unchecked, so the problem becomes increasingly worse, headlong to an eventuality of dying in a metaphorical pool of our own piss.
But, the Chinese are the only government on the planet taking a common sense approach to controlling our numbers. In Christian dominated societies, the concept of population control is considered immoral, as the churches try to outbreed each other.
Bottom line, if humans disappear, nature will still have a balance, it will just be different than it is now.
I love this quote: “The only thing that never changes is the constant wind of change”.
Quote from NeoWolfe: “But, the Chinese are the only government on the planet taking a common sense approach to controlling our numbers.”
You’re limiting your view. Look at the populations of Japan and Russia. Their populations are shrinking. They don’t have any governement mandated population controls. The US and European populations would be shrinking as well, if it wasn’t for immigration.
You don’t have to have a fascist regime to control population. As the standards of living rise, it happens spontaneously because it takes far more resources to raise a child to be a doctor or an engineer, or even a carpenter or plumber. Consequently, you end up having fewer children.
its all good neowolfe…….just please understand that I am an atheist because not one mother fer is gonna tell me about the likes and dislikes of their supernatural friends, specifically monotheism…..
geoih,
I think there is some truth in what NotSoSmart said. There is a balance in nature, but, the proof you seek will not be forthcoming, because, he like the rest of the Al Gores of the world assume that balance is stable, which is an obvious scientific absurdity. It is estimated that ninety five percent of all the species that ever existed on this planet are now extinct. While its true that if you kill off coyotes the rabbit population booms, because an existing balance is disturbed, it’s also true that if you killed all the rabbits, the coyotes would disappear as well.
They talk about global warming. Duhhhh! If the Earth wasn’t getting warmer, we’d still be in the Ice Age, when half of Europe was under a huge glacier. I read a geneticist’s theory that at the end of the Ice Age, there were about twenty reproducing human females on the planet. We were that close to becoming part of the fossil record that no one would have ever dug up. Had we gone the way of the dodo bird, the planet would be a different place, because, it cannot be denied that we pump poison into the air and water, and our population is unchecked, so the problem becomes increasingly worse, headlong to an eventuality of dying in a metaphorical pool of our own piss.
But, the Chinese are the only government on the planet taking a common sense approach to controlling our numbers. In Christian dominated societies, the concept of population control is considered immoral, as the churches try to outbreed each other.
Bottom line, if humans disappear, nature will still have a balance, it will just be different than it is now.
I love this quote: “The only thing that never changes is the constant wind of change”.
NeoWolfe
Quote from NeoWolfe: “But, the Chinese are the only government on the planet taking a common sense approach to controlling our numbers.”
You’re limiting your view. Look at the populations of Japan and Russia. Their populations are shrinking. They don’t have any governement mandated population controls. The US and European populations would be shrinking as well, if it wasn’t for immigration.
You don’t have to have a fascist regime to control population. As the standards of living rise, it happens spontaneously because it takes far more resources to raise a child to be a doctor or an engineer, or even a carpenter or plumber. Consequently, you end up having fewer children.
its all good neowolfe…….just please understand that I am an atheist because not one mother fer is gonna tell me about the likes and dislikes of their supernatural friends, specifically monotheism…..
suck it buybull and corny
geoih
No, but work will.
What is only in my mind?
Who is talking about force?