<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revoking Mormon Tax exemptions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2008/11/07/revoking_mormon_tax_exemptions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/11/07/revoking_mormon_tax_exemptions</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:05:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thx1138</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/11/07/revoking_mormon_tax_exemptions/comment-page-1#comment-91525</link>
		<dc:creator>thx1138</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91525</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I disagree. That&#039;s punishing people for having a different opinion. As odious as that opinion is that still constitutes indirect suppression of free speech.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If such a measure is to be considered it should apply to all tax exemptions for all churches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I disagree. That&#8217;s punishing people for having a different opinion. As odious as that opinion is that still constitutes indirect suppression of free speech.</p>
<p>If such a measure is to be considered it should apply to all tax exemptions for all churches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/11/07/revoking_mormon_tax_exemptions/comment-page-1#comment-91527</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91527</guid>
		<description>thx1138&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That&#039;s ridiculous. Are you saying that the US Code linked to in the post should not be enforced? Are you saying that it doesn&#039;t apply? And what is &quot;indirect suppression of free speech&quot;? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx1138</p>
<p>That&#8217;s ridiculous. Are you saying that the US Code linked to in the post should not be enforced? Are you saying that it doesn&#8217;t apply? And what is &#8220;indirect suppression of free speech&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/11/07/revoking_mormon_tax_exemptions/comment-page-1#comment-91528</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91528</guid>
		<description>thx1138&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More directly to your point ... What is being suggested is not to punish people for having a different opinion. What is being suggested is that they, by their actions, have disqualified their church from tax exempt status. It&#039;s that simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx1138</p>
<p>More directly to your point &#8230; What is being suggested is not to punish people for having a different opinion. What is being suggested is that they, by their actions, have disqualified their church from tax exempt status. It&#8217;s that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thx1138</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/11/07/revoking_mormon_tax_exemptions/comment-page-1#comment-91529</link>
		<dc:creator>thx1138</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91529</guid>
		<description>What,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, I stand corrected. Thanks for that. I didn&#039;t read the link.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know, that disqualification could be applied to *lots* of religious organizations to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What,</p>
<p>Yeah, I stand corrected. Thanks for that. I didn&#8217;t read the link.</p>
<p>You know, that disqualification could be applied to *lots* of religious organizations to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe zamecki</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/11/07/revoking_mormon_tax_exemptions/comment-page-1#comment-91530</link>
		<dc:creator>joe zamecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91530</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why gays  in California are so angry. It was put to a statewide vote, and the majority of voters got their way. The issue is over.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That&#039;s how voting can kill a huge amount of progress. To oppose the outcome of a &quot;fair election&quot; is to be against the will of the people, in theory, so who are they trying to convince, and of what?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Mormon issue is besides the point. It&#039;s like the losers trying to cheat after the game&#039;s over. Even if the Mormons broke a law...they get away with doing that all the time, regardless of voting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once again, the minority loses out, seemingly as a guarantee, with this &quot;system.&quot; It&#039;s too bad that voting is the only game in town, this time. Clearly the majority is often WAY wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW - This blog would not let me post the &quot;L&quot; word to go with &quot;gays.&quot; The result of another &quot;election&quot;? lol&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Zamecki&lt;br /&gt;
Austin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why gays  in California are so angry. It was put to a statewide vote, and the majority of voters got their way. The issue is over.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s how voting can kill a huge amount of progress. To oppose the outcome of a &#8220;fair election&#8221; is to be against the will of the people, in theory, so who are they trying to convince, and of what?</p>
<p>This Mormon issue is besides the point. It&#8217;s like the losers trying to cheat after the game&#8217;s over. Even if the Mormons broke a law&#8230;they get away with doing that all the time, regardless of voting.</p>
<p>Once again, the minority loses out, seemingly as a guarantee, with this &#8220;system.&#8221; It&#8217;s too bad that voting is the only game in town, this time. Clearly the majority is often WAY wrong.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; This blog would not let me post the &#8220;L&#8221; word to go with &#8220;gays.&#8221; The result of another &#8220;election&#8221;? lol</p>
<p>Joe Zamecki<br />
Austin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

