<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scouting for Girls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2008/10/27/scouting_for_girls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/10/27/scouting_for_girls</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cry4turtles</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/10/27/scouting_for_girls/comment-page-1#comment-90953</link>
		<dc:creator>cry4turtles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-90953</guid>
		<description>1st post, WooHoo!  The GS was not like that when I was there (70&#039;s).  I guess they&#039;re following somebody&#039;s dumbass lead (BS?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st post, WooHoo!  The GS was not like that when I was there (70&#8242;s).  I guess they&#8217;re following somebody&#8217;s dumbass lead (BS?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fosters24</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/10/27/scouting_for_girls/comment-page-1#comment-90958</link>
		<dc:creator>fosters24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-90958</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re complaining about the Girl Scouts using the word god in one fo their pledges? If that&#039;s the worst we have to worry about then things are pretty good. I wonder, do the Girl Scouts recieve taxpayer money? If not, is it really any of our business? I mean I agree that any group that recieves public funds should not be allowed to discriminate in any way, especially those damned faith based charities, however, if a group doesn&#039;t recieve any public funds, it should be allowed to set any membership If you don&#039;t approve, no one&#039;s forcing you to sign your kid up. Then again, maybe we could start some sort of Atheist scouts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re complaining about the Girl Scouts using the word god in one fo their pledges? If that&#8217;s the worst we have to worry about then things are pretty good. I wonder, do the Girl Scouts recieve taxpayer money? If not, is it really any of our business? I mean I agree that any group that recieves public funds should not be allowed to discriminate in any way, especially those damned faith based charities, however, if a group doesn&#8217;t recieve any public funds, it should be allowed to set any membership If you don&#8217;t approve, no one&#8217;s forcing you to sign your kid up. Then again, maybe we could start some sort of Atheist scouts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suttsteve</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/10/27/scouting_for_girls/comment-page-1#comment-90959</link>
		<dc:creator>suttsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-90959</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if these groups would use phrases such as &quot;to serve my god,&quot; instead of referring seemingly to just one, specific god by saying things like, &quot;to serve god.&quot; It would just be a more professional way to word their pledges, if they have to have unnecessary god-talk in them, to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if these groups would use phrases such as &#8220;to serve my god,&#8221; instead of referring seemingly to just one, specific god by saying things like, &#8220;to serve god.&#8221; It would just be a more professional way to word their pledges, if they have to have unnecessary god-talk in them, to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fosters24</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/10/27/scouting_for_girls/comment-page-1#comment-90960</link>
		<dc:creator>fosters24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-90960</guid>
		<description>Internet ate some of my post. I meant if they don&#039;t recieve public money, they should be allowed to set any standards for membership they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet ate some of my post. I meant if they don&#8217;t recieve public money, they should be allowed to set any standards for membership they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/10/27/scouting_for_girls/comment-page-1#comment-90965</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-90965</guid>
		<description>Fosters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A grocer has the right to sell only chocolate ice cream and if the customers want strawberry they have the right to ask for it. So ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fosters</p>
<p>A grocer has the right to sell only chocolate ice cream and if the customers want strawberry they have the right to ask for it. So ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

