<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finances, Money, and the Bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/30/finances_money_and_the_bailout/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/30/finances_money_and_the_bailout</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:05:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyro</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/30/finances_money_and_the_bailout/comment-page-1#comment-89862</link>
		<dc:creator>tyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89862</guid>
		<description>You guys have a little budget and a few lawyers kicking around, right?  Have you ever found out what the exact legal definition of religion is and is there a way to ram otherwise secular societies in?  As a legal ignoramus it still strikes me as discriminatory if religious groups are granted tax-exempt status for doing diddly-squat.  The big mega-churches have bowling, fast-food and JumboTron tvs, surely the bar for tax-exempt status must be pretty low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I figure there would be two outcomes that would be greatly beneficial: vast number of secular organizations suddenly become tax exempt; or it goes to trial and a court is forced to proscribe strict limits on what sorts of religions are acceptable (which is a whole lot of awesome).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m reminded of some schools offering paid days off for Jewish teachers for religious reasons which sounds like clear discrimination against atheists.  Why can&#039;t atheists get social organizations which are tax-exempt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys have a little budget and a few lawyers kicking around, right?  Have you ever found out what the exact legal definition of religion is and is there a way to ram otherwise secular societies in?  As a legal ignoramus it still strikes me as discriminatory if religious groups are granted tax-exempt status for doing diddly-squat.  The big mega-churches have bowling, fast-food and JumboTron tvs, surely the bar for tax-exempt status must be pretty low.</p>
<p>I figure there would be two outcomes that would be greatly beneficial: vast number of secular organizations suddenly become tax exempt; or it goes to trial and a court is forced to proscribe strict limits on what sorts of religions are acceptable (which is a whole lot of awesome).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reminded of some schools offering paid days off for Jewish teachers for religious reasons which sounds like clear discrimination against atheists.  Why can&#8217;t atheists get social organizations which are tax-exempt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainbows4dinosaurs</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/30/finances_money_and_the_bailout/comment-page-1#comment-89864</link>
		<dc:creator>rainbows4dinosaurs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89864</guid>
		<description>My stepfather, who&#039;s many degrees include a doctorate in world economics, has been my goto guy on money issues for years. I had a long conversation with him about the Paulson plan and he seems to think it&#039;s exactly what we need. He kept stressing that it is unlikely that we will end up owing the full $700 billion because those assets will eventually work themselves out and begin generating capital again. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also agrees that this is a death nail for the unregulated free market philosophy. I think it&#039;s pretty telling that every single industry that has undergone massive deregulation has pretty much turned to shit, or went to shit and had to be reigned back in: the telecommunications industry, commercial radio, the press, energy companies (remember Enron?), health care and other insurance, and  now our &lt;b&gt;banks&lt;/b&gt;.  They played russian ro_ulette with the driving forces of our economy and the gun has finally gone off. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And yet the dunderheads on the far right of the house are still pretending to fight for a &#039;market solution.&#039; What market are they talking about? The market is fracking wiped out! Half of it has been pretty much nationalized anyway! Idiots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My stepfather, who&#8217;s many degrees include a doctorate in world economics, has been my goto guy on money issues for years. I had a long conversation with him about the Paulson plan and he seems to think it&#8217;s exactly what we need. He kept stressing that it is unlikely that we will end up owing the full $700 billion because those assets will eventually work themselves out and begin generating capital again. </p>
<p>He also agrees that this is a death nail for the unregulated free market philosophy. I think it&#8217;s pretty telling that every single industry that has undergone massive deregulation has pretty much turned to shit, or went to shit and had to be reigned back in: the telecommunications industry, commercial radio, the press, energy companies (remember Enron?), health care and other insurance, and  now our <b>banks</b>.  They played russian ro_ulette with the driving forces of our economy and the gun has finally gone off. </p>
<p>And yet the dunderheads on the far right of the house are still pretending to fight for a &#8216;market solution.&#8217; What market are they talking about? The market is fracking wiped out! Half of it has been pretty much nationalized anyway! Idiots.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/30/finances_money_and_the_bailout/comment-page-1#comment-89865</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89865</guid>
		<description>McSame is such an ahole. He pulled his little attention getting suspending-the-campaign stunt which has now resulted in the injection of politics into this mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McSame is such an ahole. He pulled his little attention getting suspending-the-campaign stunt which has now resulted in the injection of politics into this mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teammarty</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/30/finances_money_and_the_bailout/comment-page-1#comment-89866</link>
		<dc:creator>teammarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89866</guid>
		<description>Why should churches be any different from any other mega billion corperation and hve to pay their fair share of taxes??  Then they couldn&#039;t bleed the beast, they&#039;d have to feed it.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That reminds me, isn&#039;t there something about rendering to Caesar in their bible?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even with churches paying just property tax, we could increase school funding (or cut taxes for the restof us.  Notice how tax assessments don&#039;t fall with property values.  Strange, huh??)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then, where would they get the money for restitution for the victims of abuse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should churches be any different from any other mega billion corperation and hve to pay their fair share of taxes??  Then they couldn&#8217;t bleed the beast, they&#8217;d have to feed it.  </p>
<p>That reminds me, isn&#8217;t there something about rendering to Caesar in their bible?</p>
<p>Even with churches paying just property tax, we could increase school funding (or cut taxes for the restof us.  Notice how tax assessments don&#8217;t fall with property values.  Strange, huh??)</p>
<p>But then, where would they get the money for restitution for the victims of abuse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdetrano</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/30/finances_money_and_the_bailout/comment-page-1#comment-89871</link>
		<dc:creator>mdetrano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89871</guid>
		<description>I see this bumper sticker, &quot;I&#039;m a Republican because *everyone* can&#039;t be on welfare&quot;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
..yet, here we are, a bailout that has been made necessary by the republican-neocon agenda that puts everyone one welfare (or so the greedheads would have us believe, anyhow).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not sure taxing churches would fix this...aren&#039;t they exempt for pretty much the same reason American Atheists is, anyhow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this bumper sticker, &#8220;I&#8217;m a Republican because *everyone* can&#8217;t be on welfare&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>..yet, here we are, a bailout that has been made necessary by the republican-neocon agenda that puts everyone one welfare (or so the greedheads would have us believe, anyhow).</p>
<p>Not sure taxing churches would fix this&#8230;aren&#8217;t they exempt for pretty much the same reason American Atheists is, anyhow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

