<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too much to pass up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/25/too_much_to_pass_up/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/25/too_much_to_pass_up</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UnGodly</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/25/too_much_to_pass_up/comment-page-1#comment-89580</link>
		<dc:creator>UnGodly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89580</guid>
		<description>I was draft bait during the Vietnam war.  On Feb 14, 1967 I had an interview with my local selective service board on my application as a Conscientious Objector.  I told them that I did not believe in God, but that I thought fighting in a war was immoral.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In their summary of my interview the board said &quot;We have no doubt of this young man&#039;s sincerity, however we do not see how he can qualify as a CO&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1968 I refused induction into the US Army.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1970 I was arrested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1971 the gummint dropped the charges and I won.  It seems that in failing to give a specific reason for denying my original application they had denied me due process. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it would seem that an atheist can be a Conscientious Objector, or at least they could under the Selective Service Act of 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I ended up teaching TV and small appliance repairs at a Goodwill facility as my alternative service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was draft bait during the Vietnam war.  On Feb 14, 1967 I had an interview with my local selective service board on my application as a Conscientious Objector.  I told them that I did not believe in God, but that I thought fighting in a war was immoral.</p>
<p>In their summary of my interview the board said &#8220;We have no doubt of this young man&#8217;s sincerity, however we do not see how he can qualify as a CO&#8221;.</p>
<p>In 1968 I refused induction into the US Army.</p>
<p>In 1970 I was arrested.</p>
<p>In January 1971 the gummint dropped the charges and I won.  It seems that in failing to give a specific reason for denying my original application they had denied me due process. </p>
<p>So it would seem that an atheist can be a Conscientious Objector, or at least they could under the Selective Service Act of 1967.</p>
<p>I ended up teaching TV and small appliance repairs at a Goodwill facility as my alternative service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/25/too_much_to_pass_up/comment-page-1#comment-89582</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89582</guid>
		<description>Ungodly&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the post. And thanks for your commitment to rationally directed behavior even though it could have or may have cost you dearly. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ungodly</p>
<p>Thanks for the post. And thanks for your commitment to rationally directed behavior even though it could have or may have cost you dearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/25/too_much_to_pass_up/comment-page-1#comment-89585</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89585</guid>
		<description>Dave&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This deserves a thread:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://tinyurl.com/46mzmy&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave</p>
<p>This deserves a thread:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/46mzmy" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/46mzmy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe zamecki</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/25/too_much_to_pass_up/comment-page-1#comment-89588</link>
		<dc:creator>joe zamecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89588</guid>
		<description>If this person spent a lot of his time reading the Bible, and loving it, he ought to WANT to be in the middle of combat. The Bible is part-religious mythology, and part-war manual. God&#039;s chosen people went on a tour of the holy land, slaughtering tribes out of existence along the way. I don&#039;t know what about that would ever conflict with combat in Iraq. America&#039;s kill ratio in Iraq is probably at least as good as it was back then for the chosen people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the NT, Jesus promised to do the most killing in human history and never denounced the OT kill-fest for Jehovah. Later on in the Bible, we read about Armageddon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe the judge never read the Bible...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Zamecki&lt;br /&gt;
Austin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this person spent a lot of his time reading the Bible, and loving it, he ought to WANT to be in the middle of combat. The Bible is part-religious mythology, and part-war manual. God&#8217;s chosen people went on a tour of the holy land, slaughtering tribes out of existence along the way. I don&#8217;t know what about that would ever conflict with combat in Iraq. America&#8217;s kill ratio in Iraq is probably at least as good as it was back then for the chosen people.</p>
<p>In the NT, Jesus promised to do the most killing in human history and never denounced the OT kill-fest for Jehovah. Later on in the Bible, we read about Armageddon.</p>
<p>Maybe the judge never read the Bible&#8230;</p>
<p>Joe Zamecki<br />
Austin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/09/25/too_much_to_pass_up/comment-page-1#comment-89590</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89590</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What about MY sincere beliefs?&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly what are you beliefs Dave?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I asked in an earlier thread of how one develops a moral foundation when their belief system basically says anything goes...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But instead on answering the question, the new president of AA took the easy path of character assassination and name calling...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would one of those beliefs be killing is wrong?  All killing?  Why is killing wrong? Based upon what?  And if it&#039;s based upon something, why is that &quot;something&quot; valid?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You think I&#039;m being argumentative, but I&#039;m not.  These are the questions I get from teenagers when we discuss the merits of being religious or non-religious...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly what is the code of ethics a non-believer follows and who developed those codes?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What about MY sincere beliefs?</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly what are you beliefs Dave?</p>
<p>I asked in an earlier thread of how one develops a moral foundation when their belief system basically says anything goes&#8230;</p>
<p>But instead on answering the question, the new president of AA took the easy path of character assassination and name calling&#8230;</p>
<p>Would one of those beliefs be killing is wrong?  All killing?  Why is killing wrong? Based upon what?  And if it&#8217;s based upon something, why is that &#8220;something&#8221; valid?</p>
<p>You think I&#8217;m being argumentative, but I&#8217;m not.  These are the questions I get from teenagers when we discuss the merits of being religious or non-religious&#8230;</p>
<p>Exactly what is the code of ethics a non-believer follows and who developed those codes?</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

