<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religion Restricted Realistically.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:38:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: UnGodly</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87504</link>
		<dc:creator>UnGodly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87504</guid>
		<description>Justice has been served.  Thanks to Imaginary Bearded Sky Daddy for not existing and therefore having no effect on this ruling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Praise be to the California Supreme Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice has been served.  Thanks to Imaginary Bearded Sky Daddy for not existing and therefore having no effect on this ruling.</p>
<p>Praise be to the California Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87513</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87513</guid>
		<description>Fenton and Brody should be tarred, feathered and stripped of their licenses. Such a combination of supreme ignorance and arrogance should have been caught in their interviews for medical school and they should have been rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fenton and Brody should be tarred, feathered and stripped of their licenses. Such a combination of supreme ignorance and arrogance should have been caught in their interviews for medical school and they should have been rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brutelord</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87519</link>
		<dc:creator>brutelord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87519</guid>
		<description>Hmm though I hate the government telling people they cant do something I do agree that it is a good thing. Physicians have an obligation to treat their patients regardless of sexual orientations, religion, or race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm though I hate the government telling people they cant do something I do agree that it is a good thing. Physicians have an obligation to treat their patients regardless of sexual orientations, religion, or race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87522</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87522</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Hmm though I hate the government telling people they cant do something ... &lt;/blockquote&gt; I presume that you are saying this because you don&#039;t want government to restrict rights anymore than what you deem necessary. But someone always losses and some always wins when a court decides a case. Isn&#039;t the question always &quot;What is constitutional?&quot;. I bring this up because I have, for my entire life, heard people make anger-filled statements about the government telling them what to do as though &quot;staying out of peoples lives&quot; is more important to them than holding up the constitution. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Hmm though I hate the government telling people they cant do something &#8230; </p></blockquote>
<p> I presume that you are saying this because you don&#8217;t want government to restrict rights anymore than what you deem necessary. But someone always losses and some always wins when a court decides a case. Isn&#8217;t the question always &#8220;What is constitutional?&#8221;. I bring this up because I have, for my entire life, heard people make anger-filled statements about the government telling them what to do as though &#8220;staying out of peoples lives&#8221; is more important to them than holding up the constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87523</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87523</guid>
		<description>holding up -&gt; upholding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holding up -> upholding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Ricker</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87524</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ricker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87524</guid>
		<description>This is a good ruling. IMHO, health care professionals who insist they are unable to treat certain patients because the treatment conflicts with their religious beliefs have the option of working in places where such issues will not be raised or considering a different line of work. The third option is simply to do the job they signed on to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good ruling. IMHO, health care professionals who insist they are unable to treat certain patients because the treatment conflicts with their religious beliefs have the option of working in places where such issues will not be raised or considering a different line of work. The third option is simply to do the job they signed on to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87526</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87526</guid>
		<description>George Ricker&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree. Every physician learns in medical school and residency over and over again that they will be treating people from &quot;all walks of life&quot; and that if they have a problem with that they can get out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Ricker</p>
<p>I agree. Every physician learns in medical school and residency over and over again that they will be treating people from &#8220;all walks of life&#8221; and that if they have a problem with that they can get out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pixel</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87527</link>
		<dc:creator>pixel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87527</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always interesting to me that people will object to treating/serving/renting to homosexuals, but they don&#039;t seem to have any problem dealing with adulterers or other sinners.  Is homosexuality the worst &quot;sin?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always interesting to me that people will object to treating/serving/renting to homosexuals, but they don&#8217;t seem to have any problem dealing with adulterers or other sinners.  Is homosexuality the worst &#8220;sin?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reason</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87529</link>
		<dc:creator>reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87529</guid>
		<description>What&lt;br /&gt;
i agree upholding the constitution  trumps staying out of peoples lives.&lt;br /&gt;
you will probably take issue with this but i am very uncomfortable about sperm/embryo donation in general.i fear we are turning the clock back to slavery when human life was just a commdity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What<br />
i agree upholding the constitution  trumps staying out of peoples lives.<br />
you will probably take issue with this but i am very uncomfortable about sperm/embryo donation in general.i fear we are turning the clock back to slavery when human life was just a commdity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/08/19/religion_restricted_realistically/comment-page-1#comment-87531</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87531</guid>
		<description>Reason &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
i am very uncomfortable about sperm/embryo donation in general. i fear we are turning the clock back to slavery when human life was just a commdity. &lt;/blockquote&gt; Sorry but I don&#039;t see the connection - at least not without making a bunch of guesses about what you mean. Maybe you could elaborate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plus human life in general wasn&#039;t a commodity during US slavery - it was a specific human lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reason<br />
<blockquote>
i am very uncomfortable about sperm/embryo donation in general. i fear we are turning the clock back to slavery when human life was just a commdity. </p></blockquote>
<p> Sorry but I don&#8217;t see the connection &#8211; at least not without making a bunch of guesses about what you mean. Maybe you could elaborate. </p>
<p>Plus human life in general wasn&#8217;t a commodity during US slavery &#8211; it was a specific human lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
