<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dobson: Pot.  Obama: Kettle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2008/06/24/dobson_pot_obama_kettle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/06/24/dobson_pot_obama_kettle</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david715</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/06/24/dobson_pot_obama_kettle/comment-page-1#comment-84802</link>
		<dc:creator>david715</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-84802</guid>
		<description>the whole bible is irrelevant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the whole bible is irrelevant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/06/24/dobson_pot_obama_kettle/comment-page-1#comment-84804</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-84804</guid>
		<description>TXatheist &lt;blockquote&gt; I wish the xians would come up with an official bible so this variance in interpretation would stop. &lt;/blockquote&gt; I wonder how many people would be killed world-wide and in the US over the inevitable and numerous conflicts that would arise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TXatheist<br />
<blockquote> I wish the xians would come up with an official bible so this variance in interpretation would stop. </p></blockquote>
<p> I wonder how many people would be killed world-wide and in the US over the inevitable and numerous conflicts that would arise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Kinds of Corn</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/06/24/dobson_pot_obama_kettle/comment-page-1#comment-84822</link>
		<dc:creator>All Kinds of Corn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-84822</guid>
		<description>Comment from: phreedm [Member] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Comment from: All Kinds of Corn &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did some digging, and found this link:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah...and I did some digging to see who created your web site. Listen to how this guy defends Michael Vick...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kAnXA2eTtQ&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how does this, in any way, reduce the validity of the quotes? Given that I was using the site to support Barack&#039;s adversity to legislation for exclusively religious rationale, I don&#039;t see your point. Here, you can get the same information from one of your websites:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.baptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?id=28352&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While you go ahead and dig up ways to attack the credibility of preachers that we atheists have absolutely no concern with one way or the other, I&#039;ll stick to the issues at hand. This is the quote I&#039;m using to support my opinion of Barack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
?Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God&#039;s will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all? (A Call to Renewal). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have problems with it, which I&#039;m sure you do, try to debate the merits of the argument, instead of shooting down straw men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment from: phreedm [Member] </p>
<blockquote><p>
Comment from: All Kinds of Corn </p>
<p>
I did some digging, and found this link:</p>
<p>
Yeah&#8230;and I did some digging to see who created your web site. Listen to how this guy defends Michael Vick&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kAnXA2eTtQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kAnXA2eTtQ</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>So how does this, in any way, reduce the validity of the quotes? Given that I was using the site to support Barack&#8217;s adversity to legislation for exclusively religious rationale, I don&#8217;t see your point. Here, you can get the same information from one of your websites:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?id=28352" rel="nofollow">http://www.baptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?id=28352</a></p>
<p>While you go ahead and dig up ways to attack the credibility of preachers that we atheists have absolutely no concern with one way or the other, I&#8217;ll stick to the issues at hand. This is the quote I&#8217;m using to support my opinion of Barack.</p>
<p>?Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God&#8217;s will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all? (A Call to Renewal). </p>
<p>If you have problems with it, which I&#8217;m sure you do, try to debate the merits of the argument, instead of shooting down straw men.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Ricker</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/06/24/dobson_pot_obama_kettle/comment-page-1#comment-84824</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ricker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-84824</guid>
		<description>Personally, I doubt Obama is an atheist. That sounds like wishful thinking to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think he is what he says he is: a Christian who understands the difference between private belief and public policy and recognizes that governance is a secular business. I applaud the sentiments expressed in his speech. It&#039;s great to hear an American politician acknowledging publicly what many know privately but are afraid to say.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the flack from Dobson points out beautifully is that there are many christianities, not just one. There is no &quot;true&quot; Christianity. Just a huge number of adaptations of an ancient cultural virus. Dobson&#039;s variety happens to be one of the more virulent strains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I doubt Obama is an atheist. That sounds like wishful thinking to me.</p>
<p>I think he is what he says he is: a Christian who understands the difference between private belief and public policy and recognizes that governance is a secular business. I applaud the sentiments expressed in his speech. It&#8217;s great to hear an American politician acknowledging publicly what many know privately but are afraid to say.</p>
<p>What the flack from Dobson points out beautifully is that there are many christianities, not just one. There is no &#8220;true&#8221; Christianity. Just a huge number of adaptations of an ancient cultural virus. Dobson&#8217;s variety happens to be one of the more virulent strains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boise Jim</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/06/24/dobson_pot_obama_kettle/comment-page-1#comment-85044</link>
		<dc:creator>Boise Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85044</guid>
		<description>Dobson is just a typical preacher retard who&#039;s out for nothing but fame and money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;It may be that ministers really think that their prayers do good and it may be that frogs imagine that their croaking brings spring.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-- Robert Green Ingersoll, &quot;Which Way?&quot; (1884)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Love that quote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dobson is just a typical preacher retard who&#8217;s out for nothing but fame and money.</p>
<p>&#8220;It may be that ministers really think that their prayers do good and it may be that frogs imagine that their croaking brings spring.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; Robert Green Ingersoll, &#8220;Which Way?&#8221; (1884)</p>
<p>Love that quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

