adobe photoshop training cleveland ohio Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 best place to download adobe photoshop layer effects adobe photoshop 8.0 Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended best place to download adobe photoshop 5.0 le mac adobe photoshop advanced artistry tutorials Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection best place to download adobe photoshop 7 01 adobe photoshop classes 92084 Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium best place to download adobe photoshop crack download adobe photoshop cs win Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 best place to download adobe's photoshop

Why yes, we are smarter

OK So this is elitist at best, but here’s the rub. Religion is a stupid thing. It doesn’t take brains to believe in stupid things. It DOES take brains to QUESTION stupid things, and then to identify them as stupid.

A study published in the journal “Intelligence” shows the smarter a person is, the less likely they are to believe in God.Ulster University Psychology Professor Richard Lynn found a large percentage of people with a high IQ considered themselves to be atheists.His survey of the Royal Society found that just over three percent believed in God. That compares to nearly 69 percent of Britain’s general population who are believers.During the 20th century, as intelligence levels rose, religious belief in 137 developed nations declined. Critics dismiss Lynn’s research as too simplistic.

116 Responses to “Why yes, we are smarter”

  1. avatar alexatheist says:

    Karen: Um, phreedm, I think you mean Anthony Flew.

    You just got pwned, phreedum.

  2. avatar what says:

    JCC

    It wasn?t the tree of ?knowledge in general,??as Sagan seems to be alluding to there. It was the tree of ?knowledge of good and evil??a distinction the Bible clearly makes?and that makes a huge difference when taken in the context of Genesis.

    Really? This makes a “huge” difference? … Only in the addled mind of a believer. Most xians don’t even give a damn about your buybull mythology.

  3. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    Here’s another recent survey that you guys might find interesting:

    Pew scholars said the most politically relevant finding is the fact that, as the 294-page report says, ?Americans have a non-dogmatic approach to faith? ? that is, a large majority of nearly every religious group believes there are other paths to salvation.

    According to the study, ?Seventy percent of Americans with a religious affiliation say that many religions ? not just their own ? can lead to eternal life. Most also think there is more than one correct way to interpret the teachings of their own faith.?

    In politics, that means that coalitions are possible among members of divergent religious groups.

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11268.html

    Apparently, most folks in this country are pretty flexible in their beliefs. And it’s mostly based on the stuff that makes them feel good, like going to Heaven . Perhaps that shouldn’t be surprising, but it’s a nice reminder when it seems like all we ever hear from are the fundamentalists.

  4. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    The Authority:

    It wasn?t the tree of ?knowledge in general,??as Sagan seems to be alluding to there. It was the tree of ?knowledge of good and evil??a distinction the Bible clearly makes?and that makes a huge difference when taken in the context of Genesis.

    In one version of the folk tale Cinderella, the protagonist gets her name because she is repeatedly forced to retrieve an entire bowl of grain that has been thrown into the ashes of a fireplace. In another version, she is named so simply because she is forced to sit in the ash pit when she has completed her chores.

    In either case, it’s still a story about a fairy godmother.

  5. avatar compostme says:

    I’m still new here, but just in case you can’t tell from my comment: I’m an atheist. And I happen to have a “high” IQ (in the 130s), HOWEVER:

    I don’t think it’s so much a lack of “intelligence” as it is the lack of critical thinking. Anyone — barring some major mental or physical disability — can become a critical thinker: I really believe that.

    Our education system has supremely failed to prepare students to be critical thinkers — something I think every student is capable of on some level. I also believe that critical thinking is what separates the “intelligent” from the “masses.” Nothing elitist about it; to be a critical thinker is to be free of mind control (which is basically where most people exist — dependent on perceived authorities and conforming to established norms).

    I also think that if you can think critically, you will eventually come to the conclusion there is no god.

    Our education system is more and more based on rote memorization, knowledge of facts, and adherence to one or two theories of history / science / culture. Add to that our lemming-like focus on church, fitting in, being on the “winning” team, and being patriotic, and you’ve got a recipe for a bunch of lost potential.

    After I got my law degree, I determined that the best thing I can do for the improvement of society is to become a teacher and learn the public school system inside out, so that I can then be part of reforming it.

    We’ll see how that goes. I’ve got some 30 years of work ahead of me. And then some!

  6. avatar Anonymous says:

    Religion is a stupid thing. It doesn’t take brains to believe in stupid things. It DOES take brains to QUESTION stupid things, and then to identify them as stupid.

    So if it takes brains to question stupid things, why are there so called “Atheists” who not only refuse to question judaism and zionism, but venomously defend judaism and zionism against criticism from Atheists and preach the racist tenets of judaism?

    Clearly, people like these have no business being part of American Atheists, as this violates the Aims & Principles of American Atheists Inc and this flawed mentality should be the subject of criticism of the organization.

  7. avatar Cynic says:

    I agree, Compostme. Unfortunately, it’s just not natural for so many to level any kind of critical thinking on all areas. We have to get to a point in society where thinking critically about everything, inside and out, no matter how uncomfortable it makes us, is the norm. And like most other important things, if the parents aren’t willing to do their jobs and instill that, it’s up to the schools.

    I’ve yet to hear of a grade school that goes anywhere near teaching formal logical logic and fallacies as part of their curriculum or as an elective. I’d suggest that the root cause of that is religion. Questioning is “bad” for them — they can’t take it.

  8. avatar alexatheist says:

    SecularMan,
    Those who have read my posts over the years know that I am as hard on the jews and especially the zionists, jew and xian, as anyone else. I have of course been branded as antisemitic and racist but neither label bothers me in the least.

  9. avatar Anonymous says:

    Alexatheist,
    Insults from the deluded shouldn’t bother any of us. However, these deluded people who embrace and defend elements of mythology and religious extremism and attack secular freethinkers who expose and criticize faith based racism, ethnic cleansing, apartheid, etc should NEVER be representing atheists or atheist organizations while claiming to be the face and voice of atheism.

    This would be like a self described “Muslim Atheist” being the spokesperson of American Atheists and on the board of American Atheists who, on behalf of the organization, proclaims that Islam is a race and that anyone who criticizes the Taliban, Saudia Arabia, or Islam is an “anti-Semite” guilty of “Hate Speech”. And this person then ironically stating “It DOES take brains to QUESTION stupid things, and then to identify them as stupid.” while refusing to ask those questions and attacking those who ask those questions that threatens his religious identity, while the organization he represents sits back and does nothing.

  10. avatar what says:

    SecularMan and Alex

    I agree with your last posts. I wish Alex would reconsider his racism against blacks. His racism against blacks appears irrational to me and taints his posts to this blog.

    Alex. Wa sup w’dat?

  11. avatar alexatheist says:

    Alex. Wa sup w’dat?

    Twelve years of working and living in and near Durham, NC (37.8% black) is whats up wit’ dat.

  12. avatar says:

    Comment from: alexatheist

    You just got pwned, phreedum.

    Hmmm…hardly. Anyone with a superior power would have debated the issue instead of relying on an obvious error…

  13. avatar Anonymous says:

    I agree with What and I’m sure many others. There is no excuse for racism.

    As humorous as racial humor may be, racism just isn’t funny, not even tolerable.

    Condemning a demographic group based on geographic descent or morphology because of some negative stereotypes, that may be very true of some, is just not rational.

    There are many, obvious negative stereotypes of “blacks” in America just like there are negative aspects
    and stereotypes of whites in America, ranging from the white trash rednecks, the neo-nazi skinheads, … the list goes on and on, with the categories being vast and specific, a luxury “blacks” don’t have in the USA, being lumped into one, crude blanket category identified only by the color of their skin.

    I wouldn’t claim that some southern drawl mumbling white trash bumpkin thief from Alabama who cooks meth in his trailer with the rebel flag on the side is the definition of “white” or an excuse for having animosity toward “whites”.

    I don’t see condemning people who are black while claiming that any negative behavior is a result of their skin color being any different than a jew condemning the goyim or the non-jew Palestinians claiming that any negative behavior is a result of not being a jew and being a gentile/goy.

    Ebonics is just as ridiculous as many southern “white” dialects. In fact the two are probably linked. But neither are representative of the vast amount of people who have the same or similar skin color or descent as those who butcher the English language.

    Ah, thank Y’all mat ugree, that folks ought not to be messed with cause of how sum folks may talk funny. We should be fixin tuh fat the babble banger varmints who are forsin gawd on y’all and messin with yur rats.
    Thats wut I reckon.

  14. avatar says:

    Comment from: compostme

    After I got my law degree, I determined that the best thing I can do for the improvement of society is to become a teacher and learn the public school system inside out, so that I can then be part of reforming it.

    This is a very noble choice…

    However, I believe you’ll soon learn that our educational system is dumbed down by design.

    The “Dear Hillary” letter, written on Nov. 11, 1992 by Marc Tucker, president of the National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE), lays out a plan “to remold the entire American system” into “a seamless web that literally extends from cradle to grave and is the same system for everyone,” coordinated by “a system of labor market boards at the local, state and federal levels” where curriculum and “job matching” will be handled by counselors “accessing the integrated computer-based program.”

    Tucker’s plan would change the mission of the schools from teaching children academic basics and knowledge to training them to serve the global economy in jobs selected by workforce boards. Nothing in this comprehensive plan has anything to do with teaching schoolchildren how to read, write, or calculate.

    Tucker’s ambitious plan was implemented in three laws passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton in 1994: the Goals 2000 Act, the School-to-Work Act, and the reauthorized Elementary and Secondary Education Act. These laws establish the following mechanisms to restructure the public schools:

    Bypass all elected officials on school boards and in state legislatures by making federal funds flow to the Governor and his appointees on workforce development boards.

    Use a computer database, a.k.a. “a labor market information system,” into which school personnel would scan all information about every schoolchild and his family, identified by the child’s social security number: academic, medical, mental, psychological, behavioral, and interrogations by counselors. The computerized data would be available to the school, the government, and future employers.

    Use “national standards” and “national testing” to cement national control of tests, assessments, school honors and rewards, financial aid, and the Certificate of Initial Mastery (CIM), which is designed to replace the high school diploma.
    Designed on the German system, the Tucker plan is to train children in specific jobs to serve the workforce and the global economy instead of to educate them so they can make their own life choices.

    http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/marc_tucker/

    Good luck…fight the good fight. It’s refreshing to find someone who’s willing to place others well being ahead of their own…

  15. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    ‘Secularman’:

    Insults from the deluded shouldn’t bother any of us. However, these deluded people who embrace and defend elements of mythology and religious extremism and attack secular freethinkers who expose and criticize faith based racism, ethnic cleansing, apartheid, etc should NEVER be representing atheists or atheist organizations while claiming to be the face and voice of atheism.

    Oh, yeah, Hetman, your chubby for Israel’s showing.

    Condemning a demographic group based on geographic descent or morphology because of some negative stereotypes, that may be very true of some, is just not rational.

    Look in a mirror. Practice what you ‘preach’.
    Hypocrite.

    This would be like a self described “Muslim Atheist” being the spokesperson of American Atheists and on the board of American Atheists who, on behalf of the organization, proclaims that Islam is a race and that anyone who criticizes the Taliban, Saudia Arabia, or Islam is an “anti-Semite” guilty of “Hate Speech”.

    Islam isn’t a race. Jewish is.
    Here’s your definition:
    1. A local geographic or global human population distinguished as a more or less distinct group by genetically transmitted physical characteristics.
    2. A group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographic distribution: the German race.
    3. A genealogical line; a lineage.
    4. Humans considered as a group.
    All 4…wow.
    I’m surprised that David puts up w/your presence, ‘Freethinker’.

  16. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    Evidence:

    Conclusion: Atheism has “real-world harmful consequences” as well.

    I’d suggest you read the whole paper, not just quote the parts you like.
    There’s no mention of where this study was done, how many people involved, demographics, etc.

    Plus, you’d have a very difficult task of proving that a religious person has never contributed to any technological advances.

    No, it’s not the religion that helped contribute, it was the person.

    As well as proving that primitive cultures were not content or happy with their existence – fresh air, plenty of food, clean water, lush forests, no insecticides.

    Smallpox blankets.
    Indiscriminate slaughter of buffalo.
    Introduction of syphilis.
    Slavery.
    Go look up the Goan Inquisition while you’re @ it.

  17. avatar what says:

    KA

    Look in a mirror. Practice what you ‘preach’. Hypocrite.

    Really? I don’t see how SecularMan was being hypocritical.

    Alex

    Twelve years of working and living in and near Durham, NC (37.8% black) is whats up wit’ dat.

    I just returned from a week long visit to Cary, NC. That was my first visit to the Raleigh/Durham area. There sure are a lot of chain-smok’n ignorant white folk living there. Beautiful area though.

  18. avatar Anonymous says:

    KA, you must be longing to show the world just how immature and foolish you are.

    If its not childish name calling, its baseless accusations, or red herrings, or cursing, or using the “I know you are but what am I” routine.

    You are not only embarrassing yourself but others with your juvenile & irrational behavior and lack of knowledge KA.

    Lets try to make it simple for you KA, a religion is NOT a race. If a religion preaches that it is a race, that does NOT make it true.

    And if a religion is made up of numerous races, they all do NOT then belong to another religious race.

    Example: Judaism preaches that it is a race, based on myth based racist beliefs. Like the rest of judaism, this is a false and incorrect faith based belief.

    Jews, those who believe in judaism, are comprised of Europeans, Sub-Saharan Africans, North Africans, Middle Eastern Arabs, Persians, Hispanics, and Asians… all separate and different races. None of them are from a local geographic area, none of them are united by a common history, none of them are united by nationality, none are united by geographic distribution, none of them are united by a common culture, their lineage is no more common than all others of the human species and share more of a common lineage with those of different religions in their areas.

    You failed again. BAM! You should feel pretty stupid, but don’t feel alone though, Dave Silverman fails at realizing these facts as well. Unless you have gotten used to being intellectually thrashed, or just love to be embarrassed and exposed for being dim you should just keep your delusions to yourself.

  19. avatar alexatheist says:

    I just returned from a week long visit to Cary, NC. That was my first visit to the Raleigh/Durham area. There sure are a lot of chain-smok’n ignorant white folk living there.

    Cary is the least representative area of the Triangle and is known both for its Stepford wives/soccer moms and its majority northeastern population (Cary is an acronym of “Containment Area for Relocated Yankees”). Everyone who lives in this area takes the piss with Cary.

    You should have come to Chapel Hill to see what a town with the highest per capita population of PhDs looks like.

  20. avatar what says:

    Alex

    Cary is an acronym of “Containment Area for Relocated Yankees”

    Yes. That’s what a cab driver told me.

    You should have come to Chapel Hill to see what a town with the highest per capita population of PhDs looks like.

    Really? Even more than Los Alamos? My kind’a town.

  21. avatar what says:

    Alex

    What’s up with smoking in NC? Everywhere I went there were smokers.

  22. avatar septos says:

    I am reminded of the “Gangs of new york”.Nobody accused anyone of being messed up because they were white. It was just a dysfunctional white culture ,which also makes its way into every race to some extent.

  23. avatar septos says:

    I think I better clarify that ,It was a criminal culture where the majority of the people just happen to be white.

  24. avatar jonathan smith says:

    There is little question that exposure to a scientific education reduces the likelihood that a person will believe in God, and does so in a more or less linear fashion (about 10% of the general population are atheists/agnostics, 40% of doctors, 60% of research scientists, and 93% of National Academy members).

  25. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    SecularMAN!:
    So, you wear a cape? A mask? Big black ‘S’ on your chest?

    Lets try to make it simple for you KA, a religion is NOT a race. If a religion preaches that it is a race, that does NOT make it true.

    I just gave you the definition of race from the dictionary. The Jews fit the bill. Like the Germans. Or the Irish. Even though both stem from the same sources.

    Jews, those who believe in judaism, are comprised of Europeans, Sub-Saharan Africans, North Africans, Middle Eastern Arabs, Persians, Hispanics, and Asians… all separate and different races.

    Very monochromatic. False dichotomy. It can be BOTH.
    Of course, your religion won’t allow that.

    Unless you have gotten used to being intellectually thrashed, or just love to be embarrassed and exposed for being dim you should just keep your delusions to yourself.

    You sound just like phreddy or jcc. “I WIN! I WIN!” Regardless of being proven wrong.
    You argue like a theist.

    What:

    Really? I don’t see how SecularMan was being hypocritical.

    Trust me, he’s a raving anti-Semite. I’ve dealt w/him before. David’s deleted his posts in the past. SM’s just cleaned his act up lately.

  26. avatar Cynic says:

    KA is right in regard to Jews, SM. You’re forming, as KA pointed out, a false dichotemy, which is a logical fallacy, which is a rather poor thing to be using in an a discussion you want to claim to be winning.

    What makes a “race” a race is a common set of genetic characteristics brough about by breeding isolation. Period. And there is a part of the Jewish population that fits that characteristic.

  27. avatar what says:

    Cynic

    My family was “isolated” in a small town that produced almost nothing but french, polish and blackfoot offspring. A new race is born?

    I think Secularman makes some valid points concerning jewish claims to race.

  28. avatar Cynic says:

    The disctinction from one “race” to another is and must be drawn along arbitrary lines. That isn’t to say that they “don’t exist” though. Your argument trends dangerously toward Loki’s Wager, which is a fallacy (look it up). More importantly, it’s a dead ringer for a slippery slope fallacy, where you take an argument and twist it to extremes in an attempt to make it look silly.

    Jews, as a whole, are prone to certain diseases (such as Tay-Sachs) to degrees that others are not, and vice versa, just as blacks, as a whole, tend to be more prone to certain diseases (such as sickle cell anemia).

    Again, the distinction between species and race and family are arbitrary and a matter of degree. It’s not just something observed, it’s demanded by evolution that it happen.

  29. avatar Evidence says:

    Here’s an example of how much your intelligence has done for you…

    Although cosmologists have adopted a cute name, dark energy, for whatever is driving this apparently antigravitational behavior on the part of the universe, nobody claims to understand why it is happening, or its implications for the future of the universe and of the life within it, despite thousands of learned papers, scores of conferences and millions of dollars? worth of telescope time. It has led some cosmologists to the verge of abandoning their fondest dream: a theory that can account for the universe and everything about it in a single breath…
    Through myriad techniques and observations, cosmologists have recently arrived, after decades of strife, at a robust but dark consensus regarding a cosmos in which stars and galaxies, as well as the humans who gawk at them, amount to barely more than a disputatious froth. It was born 13.7 billion years ago in the Big Bang. By weight it is 4 percent atoms and 22 percent so-called dark matter of unknown identity ? perhaps elementary particles that will be discovered at the Large Hadron Collider starting up outside Geneva this year. That leaves 74 percent for the weight of whatever began causing the cosmos to accelerate about five billion years ago.

    As far as astronomers can tell, there is no relation between dark matter, the particles, and dark energy other than the name, but you never know. Some physicists are even willing to burn down their old sainted Einstein and revise his theory of gravity, general relativity, to make the cosmic discrepancies go away.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/03/science/03dark.html?pagewanted=all

  30. avatar Evidence says:

    [..has helped you.]

    How apropos!

    I have to laugh at myself for that one.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.