<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New CPR Technique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2008/04/01/new_cpr_technique/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/04/01/new_cpr_technique</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad14146</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/04/01/new_cpr_technique/comment-page-1#comment-80164</link>
		<dc:creator>brad14146</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-80164</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re just reporting on this now.  I had this information from an acls booklet over a year ago.  I still feel this is risky considering the many hugh poss. of the individual going down due to the reasons mentioned at the end of the article.  Maybe start off by hyperventilating the pt and then proceeding w the compressions  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re just reporting on this now.  I had this information from an acls booklet over a year ago.  I still feel this is risky considering the many hugh poss. of the individual going down due to the reasons mentioned at the end of the article.  Maybe start off by hyperventilating the pt and then proceeding w the compressions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billh</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/04/01/new_cpr_technique/comment-page-1#comment-80187</link>
		<dc:creator>billh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-80187</guid>
		<description>brad:  I agree somewhat.  The success rates do appear much higher though.  Is it perfect, of course not but it is something that really should be looked into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have had to give CPR once where the woman had alcohol poisoning.  In between her heart stopping, getting her to breath and clearing out the vomit, I was constantly worried about what I was blowing down into her lungs.  The paramedics arrived in time and she suffered only a less than honerable discharge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I had to breath less and just pump her heart, I think it would have still worked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Worth thinking about.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brad:  I agree somewhat.  The success rates do appear much higher though.  Is it perfect, of course not but it is something that really should be looked into.</p>
<p>I have had to give CPR once where the woman had alcohol poisoning.  In between her heart stopping, getting her to breath and clearing out the vomit, I was constantly worried about what I was blowing down into her lungs.  The paramedics arrived in time and she suffered only a less than honerable discharge.</p>
<p>
If I had to breath less and just pump her heart, I think it would have still worked.</p>
<p>Worth thinking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thx1138</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/04/01/new_cpr_technique/comment-page-1#comment-80191</link>
		<dc:creator>thx1138</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-80191</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an additional benefit to successful resuscitation: we can ask the victim if he/she saw a brilliant white light at the end of a long blue tunnel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an additional benefit to successful resuscitation: we can ask the victim if he/she saw a brilliant white light at the end of a long blue tunnel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GodFree&Glad</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/04/01/new_cpr_technique/comment-page-1#comment-80192</link>
		<dc:creator>GodFree&Glad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-80192</guid>
		<description>This is soooo of topic, but all my dog friends think everybody should know this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have a dog... PLEASE read this and send it on. If you don&#039;t have a dog, please pass along to friends who do.  Written by:Laurinda Morris, DVM&gt; &gt; Danville Veterinary Clinic, Danville , Ohio &lt;br /&gt;
 This week I had the first case in history of RASIN TOXCIDITY ever seen at MedVet. My patient was a 56-pound, 5 yr old male neutered lab mix that ate half a canister of raisins sometime between 7:30 AM and 4:30 PM on Tuesday. He started with vomiting, diarrhea and shaking about 1AM on Wednesday but the owner didn&#039;t call my emergency service until 7AM.&lt;br /&gt;
 I had heard somewhere about raisins AND grapes causing acute Renal failure but hadn&#039;t seen any formal paper on this. We had her bring the dog in immediately. In the meantime, I called the ER service at MedVet, and the doctor there was like me - had heard something about it, but....Anyway, we contacted the ASPCA National Animal Poison Control Center and they said to give I.V. fluids at 1 1/2 times maintenance and watch the kidney values for the next 48-72 hours.&lt;br /&gt;
 The dog&#039;s BUN (blood urea nitrogen level) was already at 32 (normal less than 27) and creatinine! over 5 ( 1.9 is the high end of normal). Both are monitors of kidney function in the bloodstream. We placed an I.V. catheter and started the fluids. Rechecked the renal values at 5 PM and the BUN was over 40 and creatinine over 7 with no urine production after a liter of fluids. At the point I felt the dog was in acute renal failure and sent him on to MedVet for a urinary catheter to monitor urine output overnight as well as overnight care.&lt;br /&gt;
 He started vomiting again overnight at MedVet and his renal values have continued to increase daily. He produced urine when given lasix as a diuretic. He was on 3 different anti-vomiting medications and they still couldn&#039;t control his vomiting. Today his urine output decreased again, his BUN was over 120, his creatinine was at 10, his phosphorus was very elevated and his blood pressure, which had been staying around 150, skyrocketed to 220.. He continued to vomit and the owners elected to euthanize. &lt;br /&gt;
 This is a very sad case - great dog, great owners who had no idea raisins could be a toxin. Please alert everyone you know who has a dog of this very serious risk. POISON CONTROL SAID AS FEW AS 7 RAISINS OR GRAPES COULD BE TOXIC. Many people I know give their dogs grapes or raisins as treats including our ex-handler&#039;s. Any exposure should give rise to immediate concern. &lt;br /&gt;
 Even if you don&#039;t have a dog, you might have friends who do. This is worth passing on to them. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is soooo of topic, but all my dog friends think everybody should know this:</p>
<p>If you have a dog&#8230; PLEASE read this and send it on. If you don&#8217;t have a dog, please pass along to friends who do.  Written by:Laurinda Morris, DVM> > Danville Veterinary Clinic, Danville , Ohio <br />
 This week I had the first case in history of RASIN TOXCIDITY ever seen at MedVet. My patient was a 56-pound, 5 yr old male neutered lab mix that ate half a canister of raisins sometime between 7:30 AM and 4:30 PM on Tuesday. He started with vomiting, diarrhea and shaking about 1AM on Wednesday but the owner didn&#8217;t call my emergency service until 7AM.<br />
 I had heard somewhere about raisins AND grapes causing acute Renal failure but hadn&#8217;t seen any formal paper on this. We had her bring the dog in immediately. In the meantime, I called the ER service at MedVet, and the doctor there was like me &#8211; had heard something about it, but&#8230;.Anyway, we contacted the ASPCA National Animal Poison Control Center and they said to give I.V. fluids at 1 1/2 times maintenance and watch the kidney values for the next 48-72 hours.<br />
 The dog&#8217;s BUN (blood urea nitrogen level) was already at 32 (normal less than 27) and creatinine! over 5 ( 1.9 is the high end of normal). Both are monitors of kidney function in the bloodstream. We placed an I.V. catheter and started the fluids. Rechecked the renal values at 5 PM and the BUN was over 40 and creatinine over 7 with no urine production after a liter of fluids. At the point I felt the dog was in acute renal failure and sent him on to MedVet for a urinary catheter to monitor urine output overnight as well as overnight care.<br />
 He started vomiting again overnight at MedVet and his renal values have continued to increase daily. He produced urine when given lasix as a diuretic. He was on 3 different anti-vomiting medications and they still couldn&#8217;t control his vomiting. Today his urine output decreased again, his BUN was over 120, his creatinine was at 10, his phosphorus was very elevated and his blood pressure, which had been staying around 150, skyrocketed to 220.. He continued to vomit and the owners elected to euthanize. <br />
 This is a very sad case &#8211; great dog, great owners who had no idea raisins could be a toxin. Please alert everyone you know who has a dog of this very serious risk. POISON CONTROL SAID AS FEW AS 7 RAISINS OR GRAPES COULD BE TOXIC. Many people I know give their dogs grapes or raisins as treats including our ex-handler&#8217;s. Any exposure should give rise to immediate concern. <br />
 Even if you don&#8217;t have a dog, you might have friends who do. This is worth passing on to them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quantum_flux</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2008/04/01/new_cpr_technique/comment-page-1#comment-80195</link>
		<dc:creator>quantum_flux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-80195</guid>
		<description>Well, the difference between this and that is that provides a much higher pressurized way for air get into the lungs in between compressions (blowing air into the lungs), while this only allows for atmospheric pressures to repressurize the lungs in between compressions.  I think the old way is better, but this way is still good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the difference between this and that is that provides a much higher pressurized way for air get into the lungs in between compressions (blowing air into the lungs), while this only allows for atmospheric pressures to repressurize the lungs in between compressions.  I think the old way is better, but this way is still good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

