As the average person realizes what these people really believe they will cast there vote for another. What female would vote for someone who believes they are not equal?

They will be responsible for their own undoing.

I am not an Obama fan, but I never ceased to be amazed at pots calling kettles black.

Makes my little atheist heart sing

Asking Huckabee about the insane bullshit he believes isn’t a “religious test.”

It is when you ask questions he doesn’t want to answer.

Should we expect anything but doublespeak from politicians? It’s been called “flip-flopping” these days, but the idea is still the same: say that you support something one minute and then support the opposite the next. This gives the politician two sound bites that his/her supporters can push later (depending on which is more popular to the crowd currently listening to it).

And for those of you that believe your excretions smell better: the Democrats are equally guilty.

There are no saintly politicians just as there are no saintly religious people. It’s all talk and definitely the truth!!!

The fact that he doesn’t want to answer tells us that he’s not following the scripture: “be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you”.

Too bad scripture doesn’t stipulate that you should give answers which aren’t self-contradictory.

Too bad scripture doesn’t stipulate that you should give answers which aren’t self-contradictory.

There isn’t any particular prohibition to outright lying either.

An awful lot of xians believe that one of their commandments is “Thou shalt not lie.” There is no such commandment – the only one that talks about lying is “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.” This commandment prohibits lying about something their neighbor did. It doesn’t prohibit lying about what they do or believe.

They like to shorten this to “Thou shalt not bear false witness” and leave off the rest. Clearly they saw the caveat and covered it up, as so much often is with xians.

Peter’s post points out not only typical xtian hypocrisy, it also highlights Richard Land’s ignorance of the US constitution.

Sad, but predictable.

By the way, something like eight states still carry language in their constitutions that explicitly require religious tests, including requirement that belief in God is necessary to testify in a court of law. Such state constitutional provisions are negated by the US constitution’s 14th Amendment, of course, but it is telling that such religious bigotry still exists on the books of these states. You think for one minute Richard Land would not wholly concur with these obsolete constitutional religious tests? If you do, I’ve got a bridge for sale…