I don’t think someone that has no understanding of how science works should be President of the United States.

Besides…everyone believes in some form of creation…

And Physics…would you like to try and state your position again…?

Because he’s a Creationist? Exactly how would that have an impact as president of the US?

Anybody (like Huckabee) who thinks his god is gonna come swoopin’ down any second now and make things hunky-dory all over has no place whatsoever in a position of public trust. Trusting in a no-show to get the job done is an abuse of public trust. That’s just one problem with Huck. And don’t even try to tell me Huck doesn’t believe in the imminent return of his god. He does — it’s an article of his faith, and we all know it.

Not to worry so much, however. The GOP establishment despises him and his populist messages and agenda. Huck doesn’t stand for the elite Conservatives who really run the GOP. He’s gonna get taken out by his own, wait and see.

It’s gonna be McCain in Nov. ‘08. ‘Course, he believes this is a “Christian nation”, although such statements by him I consider to be mere pandering, but still that’s a line of b.s. no educated, intelligent American should swallow.

A record number of Democrats turned out to caucus ? more than 239,000. By contrast, 108,000 Republicans caucused on Thursday.

The radical and criminal BushCo has so alienated moderate and socially liberal republicans that they have deserted the party. All that’s left are religious nuts
and Huckabee is their man. But the religious right can not carry a federal election.

There wont be a GOP by 2009. Good riddance to that anachronism.

Obama, I’m hoping, isn’t going to make everyone attend chapel 7 days a week like Mike Huckabee would probably try to do, but is still a huge church endorser.

If it comes down to Huckabee vs. Clinton, who do you think the moderate and socially liberal republicans are going to vote for? The religious nuts don’t control the party but they still have a lot of power.