New year, new plans

Well, 2007 is over, and I’m STILL not rich. Bummer. I’m working on it though… I figure if I buy enough lottery tickets…I DO take the new year to reflect on the time past and plan the year ahead. Truth be told, I have not done enough for my activism recently due to business woes. I intend to reverse that. I’d also like to write that book — really.So let’s play tradition and talk resolutions. Where do you want to be in a year?

60 Responses to “New year, new plans”

  1.  mxracer652 says:

    Stat prof:
    The lottery is a tax on the mathematically challenged.

  2.  phreedm says:

    Comment from: HeatheNZ

    So, rna and I both did a little research (far less than yo seem to think). We found the study referenced, and the actual figures quoted in the article you referenced. We showed that the article you referenced was just plain wrong.

    Hold on…are you claiming that your ability to use the material is superior to those who actually conducted the survey? Are you calling the author of the article a liar at worst or a poor journalist at best? Are you claiming that the two of you know more about what you’re discussing then those who are actually experienced within the field?

    Arrogance…plain and simple.

    I find your response breathtakingly inappropriate, and am sad to say that all it does is show me how little your integrity must mean to you, or how important your perception of your own correctness must be

    You’ve got to be kidding…inappropriate?

    Did you go through the ENTIRE survey and replicate EXACTLY the work done by those who actually conducted the survey? And you call my answers inappropriate?

    Why would anyone reading this exchange bother to listen to your god assertions when you show yourself to be so unwilling to concede to an error

    Tell you what…write to the author of the article and write to those who actually conducted the survey and tell them that their research is wrong…

    If THEY agree with you, then of course I’ll concede that an article I referenced was in error…

    Hey…I’m curious. Did you break down the online Harris poll also?

    I doubt it…

  3.  mryder66 says:

    phreedm

    Hold on…are you claiming that your ability to use the material is superior to those who actually conducted the survey?

    The article you quoted was not produced by the researchers, so no.

    Are you calling the author of the article a liar at worst or a poor journalist at best?

    I think that in this case the figures used are clearly not what was published in the research, so yes.

    Just checking the facts presented…

  4.  IVORY GIRL says:

    Green, John C.. The American Religious Landscape and Political Attitudes: A Baseline for 2007 University of Akron. Retrieved on 2007-06-18.
    From 8.2% in 1990 / 14.2% in 2007 described themselves as agnostic, atheist, or simply having no religion,still significantly less than in other postindustrial countries such as Britain (44%) and Sweden (69%).
    This study is referenced in the U.S. Census Bureau’s Statistical Abstract of the United States.

  5.  reason says:

    the best to all of you in 2008 and beyond.
    i have a ? for you all, what about all those who particpate in a religion but don’t actually believe.should they be counted as religious or atheist.some go for sense of community/cultural identity, on the surface they are religious but actual belief they scoff at supernatural claims.

  6.  karen says:

    reason

    for you all, what about all those who particpate in a religion but don’t actually believe.should they be counted as religious or atheist.

    They should be counted as whatever they identify themselves as, I would think. Who else but they, themselves, can say what they are?

  7.  mryder66 says:

    karen,

    They should be counted as whatever they identify themselves as, I would think.

    I’d agree with that.

    Who else but they, themselves, can say what they are?

    jcc seems to think he can decide who can and cannot call themselves christian.

  8.  karen says:

    OK. Late new year resolution:

    I resolve not to feed the troll named phreedm.
    Have been practicing quietly for a few days; now I’m ready to make the commitment and announce my intentions, so you guys can whip me if I falter.

  9.  rna2dna says:

    karen, that’s exciting! Should I be wanting the ice cream or the cake, what a tortuously delicious decree.

  10.  DVanWechel says:

    Karen,

    …so you guys can whip me if I falter.

    Ok, but no cheating just so you can get a spankie.

    By the way, welcome to the no-response-to-phreedm coalition. I joined months ago. It can be very difficult to maintain one’s silence, but it is also very rewarding.