<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atheists on CNN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:38:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stilhorn</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70190</link>
		<dc:creator>stilhorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70190</guid>
		<description>you can always rely on fox to be bias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can always rely on fox to be bias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mushinronjya</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70191</link>
		<dc:creator>mushinronjya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70191</guid>
		<description>Ok so, is this gonna be on youtube?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so, is this gonna be on youtube?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernarda</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70207</link>
		<dc:creator>bernarda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70207</guid>
		<description>Fox Newsiness pundits will probably come out with their usual professions of faith. Next time, why not just ask them directly: Why do you believe in an invisible dictator in the sky?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What evidence do you have for your belief?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than trying to defend non-belief, take the offensive and make them defend belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox Newsiness pundits will probably come out with their usual professions of faith. Next time, why not just ask them directly: Why do you believe in an invisible dictator in the sky?</p>
<p>What evidence do you have for your belief?</p>
<p>Rather than trying to defend non-belief, take the offensive and make them defend belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reason</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70212</link>
		<dc:creator>reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70212</guid>
		<description>i hope the media doesn&#039;t try to make it look like we don&#039;t have compassion for the victims families or we don&#039;t respect police.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope the media doesn&#8217;t try to make it look like we don&#8217;t have compassion for the victims families or we don&#8217;t respect police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pha</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70214</link>
		<dc:creator>pha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70214</guid>
		<description>Get ready for the shoutdown. Fox is good for Jerry Springer type debating. Whoever is the loudest is right! Bring your megaphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get ready for the shoutdown. Fox is good for Jerry Springer type debating. Whoever is the loudest is right! Bring your megaphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phreedm</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70216</link>
		<dc:creator>phreedm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70216</guid>
		<description>Just one more perfect example of how the Treaty of Tripoli has been misinterpreted...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you scratch your head, reread the 10th Amendment...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alex...do you know why Connecticut is known as the Constitution State?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one more perfect example of how the Treaty of Tripoli has been misinterpreted&#8230;</p>
<p>As you scratch your head, reread the 10th Amendment&#8230;</p>
<p>Alex&#8230;do you know why Connecticut is known as the Constitution State?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billh</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70218</link>
		<dc:creator>billh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70218</guid>
		<description>phreedummy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this a White Mans nation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How was the Treaty writen in English mistranslated to you?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 10th:&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is supported by the 1st.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Both the Connecticut and New Haven Colonies established documents of Fundamental Orders, considered the first constitutions in North America.&quot;  In 1959 the General assembly designated Connecticut with the nickname &quot;Constitution State&quot;  (This is debated though)  So what is your point?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also known as the Nutmeg State,Provisions state, and Land of Steady Habits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phreedummy:</p>
<p>Is this a White Mans nation?</p>
<p>How was the Treaty writen in English mistranslated to you?</p>
<p>The 10th:<br />
&#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is supported by the 1st.</p>
<p>Wikipedia:<br />
&#8220;Both the Connecticut and New Haven Colonies established documents of Fundamental Orders, considered the first constitutions in North America.&#8221;  In 1959 the General assembly designated Connecticut with the nickname &#8220;Constitution State&#8221;  (This is debated though)  So what is your point?</p>
<p>It is also known as the Nutmeg State,Provisions state, and Land of Steady Habits</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phreedm</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70235</link>
		<dc:creator>phreedm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70235</guid>
		<description>DD...you really can&#039;t be that ignorant...now can you?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;States Rights&quot;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alex requested one founding document stating a nation founded on christianity...I did...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed he&#039;d go to a church and give $1000.00...and as we all knew...he reneged...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, here&#039;s another &quot;founding document&quot; based upon christianity...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t wait to hear the spin...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;This appears to be the first written constitution in the Western tradition which created a government, and it is easily seen to be the prototype of our Federal Constitution, adopted exactly one hundred and fifty years later.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;For as much as it hath pleased Almighty God by the wise disposition of his divine providence so to order and dispose of things that we the Inhabitants and Residents of Windsor, Hartford and Wethersfield are now cohabiting and dwelling in and upon the River of Connectecotte and the lands thereunto adjoining; and well knowing where a people are gathered together the word of God requires that to maintain the peace and union of such a people there should be an orderly and decent Government established according to God, to order and dispose of the affairs of the people at all seasons as occasion shall require; do therefore associate and conjoin ourselves to be as one Public State or Commonwealth; and do for ourselves and our successors and such as shall be adjoined to us at any time hereafter, enter into Combination and Confederation together, to maintain and preserve the liberty and purity of the Gospel of our Lord Jesus which we now profess, as also, the discipline of the Churches, which according to the truth of the said Gospel is now practiced amongst us; as also in our civil affairs to be guided and governed according to such Laws, Rules, Orders and Decrees as shall be made, ordered, and decreed as followeth:&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.constitution.org/bcp/fo_1639.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DD&#8230;you really can&#8217;t be that ignorant&#8230;now can you?</p>
<p>&#8220;States Rights&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Alex requested one founding document stating a nation founded on christianity&#8230;I did&#8230;</p>
<p>Claimed he&#8217;d go to a church and give $1000.00&#8230;and as we all knew&#8230;he reneged&#8230;</p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s another &#8220;founding document&#8221; based upon christianity&#8230;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to hear the spin&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>This appears to be the first written constitution in the Western tradition which created a government, and it is easily seen to be the prototype of our Federal Constitution, adopted exactly one hundred and fifty years later.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>For as much as it hath pleased Almighty God by the wise disposition of his divine providence so to order and dispose of things that we the Inhabitants and Residents of Windsor, Hartford and Wethersfield are now cohabiting and dwelling in and upon the River of Connectecotte and the lands thereunto adjoining; and well knowing where a people are gathered together the word of God requires that to maintain the peace and union of such a people there should be an orderly and decent Government established according to God, to order and dispose of the affairs of the people at all seasons as occasion shall require; do therefore associate and conjoin ourselves to be as one Public State or Commonwealth; and do for ourselves and our successors and such as shall be adjoined to us at any time hereafter, enter into Combination and Confederation together, to maintain and preserve the liberty and purity of the Gospel of our Lord Jesus which we now profess, as also, the discipline of the Churches, which according to the truth of the said Gospel is now practiced amongst us; as also in our civil affairs to be guided and governed according to such Laws, Rules, Orders and Decrees as shall be made, ordered, and decreed as followeth:</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.constitution.org/bcp/fo_1639.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.constitution.org/bcp/fo_1639.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billh</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70252</link>
		<dc:creator>billh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70252</guid>
		<description>phreedummy:  You are the ignorant one.  Answer the question.  Is this a White Mans nation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are also qouting from Reverend Thomas Hooker, in 1693, for three Connecticut towns, a general court where Hooker delivered a sermon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alex has not been proven wrong.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THis is a sample of how xtians love to confuse the gullible.  Not really even a good attempt.&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phreedummy:  You are the ignorant one.  Answer the question.  Is this a White Mans nation?</p>
<p>
You are also qouting from Reverend Thomas Hooker, in 1693, for three Connecticut towns, a general court where Hooker delivered a sermon.</p>
<p>Alex has not been proven wrong.  </p>
<p>THis is a sample of how xtians love to confuse the gullible.  Not really even a good attempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernarda</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/11/22/atheists_on_cnn/comment-page-1#comment-70253</link>
		<dc:creator>bernarda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70253</guid>
		<description>phreedy is again quote mining, but it is hard to see what the wingnut is referring to here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phreedy is again quote mining, but it is hard to see what the wingnut is referring to here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
