<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain makes it clear &#8212; fact comes secondary to politics.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:44:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67391</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67391</guid>
		<description>McCain is still alive?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When will these dumb ideas just fade away....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and how old is Phreedumb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain is still alive?</p>
<p>When will these dumb ideas just fade away&#8230;.</p>
<p>and how old is Phreedumb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Shackleford</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67392</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67392</guid>
		<description>McCain&lt;blockquote&gt;I just have to say in all candor that since this nation was founded primarily on Christian principles...&lt;/blockquote&gt;WRONG.  There is only one christian principle: love the christian god with all your heart, and love your neighbor as yourself.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That principle does not appear in any of this nation&#039;s founding documents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain<br />
<blockquote>I just have to say in all candor that since this nation was founded primarily on Christian principles&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>WRONG.  There is only one christian principle: love the christian god with all your heart, and love your neighbor as yourself.  </p>
<p>That principle does not appear in any of this nation&#8217;s founding documents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alatham</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67393</link>
		<dc:creator>alatham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67393</guid>
		<description>Rusty,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You forgot to mention &quot;Push your political agendas by pandering to the religious&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Or is that something that only politicians do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rusty,</p>
<p>You forgot to mention &#8220;Push your political agendas by pandering to the religious&#8221;.</p>
<p>Or is that something that only politicians do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stilhorn</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67394</link>
		<dc:creator>stilhorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67394</guid>
		<description>This is unrelated, but apparently Christen conservatives are considering a new party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071001/ap_po/conservatives_third_party;_ylt=AgmvumMUtrybEuaHSQNC87Ws0NUE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is unrelated, but apparently Christen conservatives are considering a new party.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071001/ap_po/conservatives_third_party;_ylt=AgmvumMUtrybEuaHSQNC87Ws0NUE" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071001/ap_po/conservatives_third_party;_ylt=AgmvumMUtrybEuaHSQNC87Ws0NUE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrant Prince</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67397</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrant Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67397</guid>
		<description>James Madison&#039;s notes taken during his tenure as a delegate to the constitutional convention are compiled in Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 (1987, Prometheus Books, edited by Gaillard Hunt and James Brown Scott) are dry reading, to be sure, but if you diligently trudge through it a certain conclusion becomes inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The straight-forward words of the delegates during their convention and deliberations, as scrupulously and assiduously recorded and transcribed by Madison, monumentally stand as their affirmation that they explicitly understood the nature of the task before them:  to define, constitutionally, the what, when, where, who, how, and why that this new nation was to be, and that this work was no mere academic stage show, but was rather a do-or-perish juncture of human progress.  To them, something completely different was demanded if the newly independent states were to escape a premature demise.  They knew that a national government was the only viable option.  Precisely how this government was to be structured and implemented was the job they set their hand to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the beginning, one mandate was crystal clear:  it had to be the people&#039;s national government; a national government of, for, and by the people.  On this question, &quot;God&quot; had little, if any, regard in their deliberations, motions, resolutions, or intent.  The debates of 1787 were about the American people and the forging of their constitution.  They were not about God or The Holy Bible.  No part of the Bible was referred to in any of their speeches or written motions except in a very passing manner on very few occasions.  Certainly not one single article of the constitution they collectively authored and signed has as its origin any words that are referenced to any biblical citation.  Not one!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator John McCain  -- Panderer in Cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Madison&#8217;s notes taken during his tenure as a delegate to the constitutional convention are compiled in Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 (1987, Prometheus Books, edited by Gaillard Hunt and James Brown Scott) are dry reading, to be sure, but if you diligently trudge through it a certain conclusion becomes inevitable.</p>
<p>The straight-forward words of the delegates during their convention and deliberations, as scrupulously and assiduously recorded and transcribed by Madison, monumentally stand as their affirmation that they explicitly understood the nature of the task before them:  to define, constitutionally, the what, when, where, who, how, and why that this new nation was to be, and that this work was no mere academic stage show, but was rather a do-or-perish juncture of human progress.  To them, something completely different was demanded if the newly independent states were to escape a premature demise.  They knew that a national government was the only viable option.  Precisely how this government was to be structured and implemented was the job they set their hand to.</p>
<p>From the beginning, one mandate was crystal clear:  it had to be the people&#8217;s national government; a national government of, for, and by the people.  On this question, &#8220;God&#8221; had little, if any, regard in their deliberations, motions, resolutions, or intent.  The debates of 1787 were about the American people and the forging of their constitution.  They were not about God or The Holy Bible.  No part of the Bible was referred to in any of their speeches or written motions except in a very passing manner on very few occasions.  Certainly not one single article of the constitution they collectively authored and signed has as its origin any words that are referenced to any biblical citation.  Not one!</p>
<p>Senator John McCain  &#8212; Panderer in Cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexatheist</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67398</link>
		<dc:creator>alexatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67398</guid>
		<description>I wish Hillary would stop pandering to the Right with all of her god talk and admit that she&#039;s a nonbeliever. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Hillary would stop pandering to the Right with all of her god talk and admit that she&#8217;s a nonbeliever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spanders</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67400</link>
		<dc:creator>spanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67400</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going through &quot;The Great Upheaval: America and the Birth of the Modern World 1788-1800&quot;. It&#039;s a fascinating study of the systemic nature of the birth of a nation. It focuses on world politics of the time and how it is very much interrelated. To say that this nation is based on Christian values is a misunderstanding of how this nation came into being and the competing schools of thought at the tiime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Off topic and perhaps suited for another thread, but it would be interesting to discuss the role of the monks in Myanmar and how their religious affiliation made this protest viable and how this protest compares to previous student lead protests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going through &#8220;The Great Upheaval: America and the Birth of the Modern World 1788-1800&#8243;. It&#8217;s a fascinating study of the systemic nature of the birth of a nation. It focuses on world politics of the time and how it is very much interrelated. To say that this nation is based on Christian values is a misunderstanding of how this nation came into being and the competing schools of thought at the tiime.</p>
<p>Off topic and perhaps suited for another thread, but it would be interesting to discuss the role of the monks in Myanmar and how their religious affiliation made this protest viable and how this protest compares to previous student lead protests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67401</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67401</guid>
		<description>Alex&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary won&#039;t stop pandering. You can&#039;t get elected without selling the snake oil in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex<br />
Hillary won&#8217;t stop pandering. You can&#8217;t get elected without selling the snake oil in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pha</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67409</link>
		<dc:creator>pha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67409</guid>
		<description>Celebrant Prince &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should read the Federalist Papers too, if you haven&#039;t already. There&#039;s almost nothing about religion at all.    Madison is mostly concerned with factions grabbing too much power in the government and special interests taking over. I wish more people would read this stuff, so they can sift through the bs that guys like McCain shovel out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrant Prince </p>
<p>You should read the Federalist Papers too, if you haven&#8217;t already. There&#8217;s almost nothing about religion at all.    Madison is mostly concerned with factions grabbing too much power in the government and special interests taking over. I wish more people would read this stuff, so they can sift through the bs that guys like McCain shovel out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/10/01/mccain_makes_it_clear_fact_comes_seconda/comment-page-1#comment-67414</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-67414</guid>
		<description>pha,&lt;br /&gt;
Is Madison the one that thought, in order to keep special interest from gaining a stranglehold on gov&#039;t., EVERYONE could lobby congress?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pha,<br />
Is Madison the one that thought, in order to keep special interest from gaining a stranglehold on gov&#8217;t., EVERYONE could lobby congress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
