adobe photoshop training cleveland ohio Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 best place to download adobe photoshop layer effects adobe photoshop 8.0 Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended best place to download adobe photoshop 5.0 le mac adobe photoshop advanced artistry tutorials Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection best place to download adobe photoshop 7 01 adobe photoshop classes 92084 Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium best place to download adobe photoshop crack download adobe photoshop cs win Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 best place to download adobe's photoshop

Texas Protest!

ALL OUT FOR THE 2007TEXAS STATE/CHURCH SEPARATION RALLY ~ SATURDAY, SEPT. 8 !For state-church separation. for the civil rights of non-religious people, for the Croft family in Carrollton, and for our right to be free from theocratic state laws,CALLING ALL FREETHINKERS!http://www.atheists.org/txJoin us on the steps of the Texas State Capitol on Saturday, September 8, 2007 for the Texas State-Church Separation Rally from 12:00 noon to 3:00 PM. All Freethinkers are urged to attend — Atheists, Agnostics, Rationalists, Realists, Secularists, Secular Humanists, Brights, and every other title in the Freethought lexicon will be represented! Bring your group’s banner and some friends!Confirmed speakers include:* JOE ZAMECKI, Texas State Director, American Atheists* DICK HOGAN, Assistant Texas State Director, American Atheists* NICHOLAS PASCHALL, President, UTSA Secular Student Alliance* MARSHA CORREIRA, Texas Civil Rights Activist* PATRICK GREENE, San Antonio Atheist Activist* DEREK JONES, Co-founder, PathofReason.com* BECKY ROBINSON, Founder, President, Freethinkers of UT Arlington* NICK LEE, President, Freethinkers Association of Central Texas* TERRY MCDONALD, Chairman, Dallas/Ft. Worth Metroplex Atheists* MEGHAN REGIS, Atheist Agenda, University of Texas San AntonioPLUS live music from Austin guitarist Joe Broome — and a voter registration tableNEWS AND UPDATES AT HTTP://WWW.ATHEISTS.ORG/TXWHAT: The 2007 Texas State-Church Separation RallyWHEN: Saturday, September 8, 2007 12:00 noon – 3:00 PMWHERE: The South steps of the Texas State Capitol, Austin TexasMORE INFO: http://www.atheists.org/tx or jzamecki@atheists.org (AMERICAN ATHEISTS is a nationwide movement that defends civil rights for Atheists, Freethinkers and other nonbelievers; works for the total separation of church and state; and addresses issues of First Amendment public policy.)

75 Responses to “Texas Protest!”

  1. avatar dawnisis says:

    “I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours”
    - Stephen Roberts

    The above quote is for you phreedm. It explains clearly why it is absurd for you to expect atheists to study your religion in order to dismiss it. I no more have to learn about jesus than I do about zeus to know neither one is true.

  2. avatar brucev says:

    There is no such thing as ‘Atheism.’
    Why? If an Atheist, someone who declares there is no G-d, no creator, wants any intellectual credibility they MUST answer this question:
    How did the world come into being?
    1. Was it always here?
    2. Did it happen by accident?
    According to the calculations of British mathematician Roger Penrose show that the probability of universe conducive to life occurring by chance is in 1 to the 123rd power. This means the number 1 with 123 zeros. The phrase “extremely unlikely” is inadequate to describe this possibility. It’s not even ‘probable.’
    Since no normal, or honest Atheist (Or anyone else) would invest in a business with such odds (But a dishonest and biased person will stand by such odds), you can bet they wouldn’t stand up against these odds regarding anything else, unless they’re not honest and have an agenda. Atheism is probably due to some unfortunate illness, problem or a rebellious nature-hubris.
    No self-respecting intellectual should ever get into a conversation with them because they get emotional and even angry.
    bruce v. hoffinger

  3. avatar Rusty Shackleford says:

    If an Atheist, someone who declares there is no G-d, no creator, wants any intellectual credibility they MUST answer this question:
    How did the world come into being?

    If a Theist, someone who declares there is a god, a creator, wants any intellectual credibility, they MUST answer this question: How did their god come into being?

  4. avatar dawnisis says:

    brusev,

    If an Atheist, someone who declares there is no G-d, no creator, wants any intellectual credibility they MUST answer this question:

    We MUST answer??? Questions YOU devised?

    Your questions: “How did the world come into being?
    1. Was it always here?
    2. Did it happen by accident?”

    imply that if humanity doesn’t have all of the answers yet to how the universe began we should all just “pick” an organized religion, take an oath that only “my” religion is the “truth” and all other gods are “false”, pray to a god or gods for an afterlife, and tithe them 10% of our earnings is just ridiculous.

    It is more than a slight leap of probability to get from “i don’t know how the universe started” to “my god is the one true god” and all others will burn eternally.

    No self-respecting intellectual should ever get into a conversation with them because they get emotional and even angry.

    You probably shouldn’t consider yourself a “self-respecting intellectual” since your entire post is littered with insults, disingenuous statements and questions, but “we” may answer with anger?

  5. avatar dawnisis says:

    brucev said:

    According to the calculations of British mathematician Roger Penrose show that the probability of universe conducive to life occurring by chance is in 1 to the 123rd power. This means the number 1 with 123 zeros. The phrase “extremely unlikely” is inadequate to describe this possibility. It’s not even ‘probable.’

    All this demonstrates to me is that Penrose demonstrated there was a 1 to the 123rd power chance that the universe was created at random.

    It is easy to understand once you realize the universe had billions upon billions of years for this “chance” to occur, and when you factor in an unlimited timeframe the odds grow higher upon higher until the probably drops to a certainty that the UNIVERSE WAS CREATED BY CHANCE.

  6. avatar Obeah says:

    There is no such thing as ‘Atheism.’

    Actually there is no such thing as a christian; no one lives as He did. We learned this recently in our bible studies. “He is not a True christian.”

    …they MUST answer this question:

    No, no, no. We must ASK the question(s).

  7. avatar karen says:

    bruce said

    According to the calculations of British mathematician Roger Penrose show that the probability of universe conducive to life occurring by chance is in 1 to the 123rd power. This means the number 1 with 123 zeros. The phrase “extremely unlikely” is inadequate to describe this possibility. It’s not even ‘probable.’

    And yet, oh my, here we are.

    As to your questions, we aren’t obliged to answer any of them. As Obeah says, we are usually the one doing the asking.

  8. avatar Rusty Shackleford says:

    …1 to the 123rd power. This means the number 1 with 123 zeros.

    Actually, “1 to the 123rd power” = 1. So your position is that it is a certainty that the universe was created by chance.

    Nice work, Bruce.

  9. avatar tarma says:

    Actually, “1 to the 123rd power” = 1. So your position is that it is a certainty that the universe was created by chance.

    Nice work, Bruce.

    Priceless!! Good one, Rusty – I needed a good chuckle today. And keep up those illogical arguments, Brucie. You must have been home schooled by fundie parents.

    Just what we needed, another xian troll (sigh).

  10. avatar aajoeyjo says:

    Rusty,

    Oh well. lol I remember that on King of the Hill. I went to high school at Katy High School, the birth of “solemnization,” which was another moment-of-silence type scheme that inspired a lawsuit and some media coverage a few years ago. They still have the moment of silence there…over the intercom…! lol

  11. avatar dawnisis says:

    I don’t even think the mathematics of brucev is even theoretically possible, perhaps someone could explain it to me.

    How could a 1 to the 123rd power odds even be calculated without knowing the entire timespan of the universe because time itself would increase the chance of such an anomaly as chance?

    And are we to presume the other 122nd power means a god did it? What factors would be needed to even mathematically do these equations.

    It is more likley the universe formed by chance than by a god because even if a god did it then who made the god exist, at somepoint “chance” becomes the absolute answer.

  12. avatar what says:

    Brucev

    You are a moron. Life exists. Therefore probability of its occurrence was one. Man how stupid can you be. Do you know even know what the word “probability” means. It is all CONDITIONAL you f’ing idiot. Another homeschooler!

  13. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    brucev:

    According to the calculations of British mathematician Roger Penrose show that the probability of universe conducive to life occurring by chance is in 1 to the 123rd power. This means the number 1 with 123 zeros. The phrase “extremely unlikely” is inadequate to describe this possibility. It’s not even ‘probable.’

    Penrose also stated:

    The book is an attack on aspects of artificial intelligence. In it he argues that there are aspects of mathematics that cannot be tied to a set of rules. We cannot allow ?one universally formal system?equivalent to all the mathematicians’ algorithms for judging mathematical truth.? Such a system would violate G?del’s theorem. Nor can we accept that algorithms used are so complicated and obscure that their validity can never be known. We do not in fact ascertain mathematical truth solely through the use of algorithms.

    I’ve always been rather…puzzled at this worn out argument. ‘Look at the odds!’
    I think it makes less sense. Why on earth would any deity take long-shot odds? Besides which, as compared to what? The lack of life in other universes?
    I think it makes our existence more of an accident if a deity exists.
    How often did gawd dice at craps, until it hit sacred seven?

  14. avatar what says:

    KA

    I’ve always been rather…puzzled at this worn out argument. ‘Look at the odds!’

    I’m not puzzled. The argument is just stupid.

    For Brucev’s sake:

    Suppose I flip a quarter and ask persons A and B what the probability of the heads event is. Person A answers 1/2 and person B answers 9/10. Who is right? Well if they did their math correctly they both are. B must have known more about the coin tossing dynamics than person A. When anyone says the probability of life forming was 1/100000000000000 what they are saying is that they don’t know much and that is all. It does not mean that the formation of life was unlikely. Such a statement is meaningless.

  15. avatar alatham says:

    Dear Bruce,

    You’ve made one enormous error. It is ALWAYS better to answer “I don’t know” than it is to make up an answer.

    Making up answers is intellectually dishonest.

    We also don’t need to know the origin of the universe to know that adding a deity to the mix only makes the universe’s existence even more unlikely.

    An analogy: The chances of a fruit cocktail leaping into existence with no prodding are enormously small. The chances of a fruit cocktail with a small party umbrella leaping into existence are even smaller.

    So to answer that question, we don’t know how the universe came into existence. Humanity will spend the next few hundred (or more) years thinking about it. Remember that science is progressive. If we don’t have an answer now, come back next week.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.