adobe photoshop training cleveland ohio Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 best place to download adobe photoshop layer effects adobe photoshop 8.0 Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended best place to download adobe photoshop 5.0 le mac adobe photoshop advanced artistry tutorials Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection best place to download adobe photoshop 7 01 adobe photoshop classes 92084 Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium best place to download adobe photoshop crack download adobe photoshop cs win Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 best place to download adobe's photoshop

What’s wrong with government promotion of religion?

A priest, a rabbi, and a Greek Orthodox layperson went to the hospital the other day and a Methodist minister dissed all three with religious slurs.Sound like the start to another religious joke? Think again. Congress is seeking an IG probe over the head (a Methodist minister named Rev. O. Ray Fitzgerald) of the Spiritual Ministry Department of the National Institute of Health’s religious bigotry.The priest and the rabbi filed EEOC complaints against the Department of Health and Human Services who oversees NIH and the Greek Orthodox layperson is suing HHS.The Secretary of HHS Mike Leavitt called in outsiders to investigate but Rep. Steve Rothman (D-NJ) on the Appropriations Committee has placed money in HHS’s budget to conduct an IG investigation. Reps. Dan Burton (R-IN), Tom Lantos (D-CA) and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) joined Rep. Rothman in a letter to Secretary Leavitt stating he needs to do more to remedy religious discrimination at NIH.Got the joke yet? Religion has no part whatsoever in our government. Way too divisive in Health and Human Services for sure. Way too divisive throughout all of history for that matter. Anytime you employ any religion in a society as diverse as ours, you are asking for trouble. Peter Nuhn

52 Responses to “What’s wrong with government promotion of religion?”

  1. avatar spanders says:

    Thanks fairydogmother! I don’t have time for a very thoughtful response at the moment. However, I think the David should have the pull string where he says:

    8 May his days be few;
    may another take his place of leadership.

    9 May his children be fatherless
    and his wife a widow.

    10 May his children be wandering beggars;
    may they be driven [a] from their ruined homes.

    11 May a creditor seize all he has;
    may strangers plunder the fruits of his labor.

    12 May no one extend kindness to him
    or take pity on his fatherless children.
    (Psalm 109:8-12)

    WHEEEEEE!!!!!!

  2. avatar jshanewhit says:

    Again we get the troll, telling us there is no separation of church and state. It in no myth. It was a founding theme of our country.

    I am very concerned by this administration’s, refusal to honor our constitution. I doubt there will be any recall of these “religious” measures taken by Shrub and Friends. It is still political suicide to speak publicly against Christianity.

    I hope that I am shown wrong, I hope that our country will be restored. I just have little faith in our population.

  3. avatar nissimlevy says:

    Peter, I think is plain and simple economics and it is far from the “religious believes”, it has always been an excuse to either control peoples or for personal gain, which it is control. The ministers and sinisters are afraid of loosing their jobs. It is common in history to see similar problems. Akhnaten, the ancient egyptian pharaoh, did not become monotheist just because his “spiritual feelings told him that there is only one god” but because he waisted too much food and state wealth feeding so many priests and families for free; thousands of gods and too many priests for each god. And when the priests heard the news of monotheism they may have reacted the same ways as Rev. O. Ray Fitzgerald. The priests’ agenda is to keep themselves going. The sad part is that our money is at stake. And it is our society’s fault, our own fault, for being so lethargic in political education and “school” education.
    We live in a free democratic society, I hope, and that’s the price we may be paying = the right to ignorance.

  4. avatar reason says:

    spanders
    you don’t mind loose women but your wife does hehe.
    phreedm
    point out one verse that says the gov’t of usa and church should be mixed.did not jesus warn against hypocrites who wear their religion on the sleeve for all to see.you are commanded to practice your faith not rub it in peoples faces.do you agree or disagree with this reading of the scripture.

  5. avatar spanders says:

    reason, once again, I love your posts

  6. avatar BrotherRichard says:

    If there was only a way to get more push behind Ron Paul. He would do Goldwater proud.

    Richard
    http://lifewithoutfaith.com

  7. avatar reason says:

    spanders
    glad it made you laughed.and no i’m not trying to pick on phreedm but every christian who has made a positive impression on me.was one who simply practiced their faith the louds one always ended up having some dirty secret coming out.

  8. avatar reason says:

    i would like to add i was also impressed by a jewish family and a atheist i knew each was firm in living what they believed buy not showoffs or pushy.it is something how your conduct can influence others long after you are dead with out you knowing it at the time you are around those people.

  9. avatar cry4turtles says:

    “I remember well the days before the country went jesus-crazy”

    Oh yes, Godfree, and what wonderful days they were. I remember studying evolution in school with no controversy, complaints, or protests. My peers did not even discuss religion; we just did our thing. Churches were small and quaint, and not even so bad to attend on occasion because people weren’t fanatics. When J. Witnesses came around, everybody got a laugh out of it, indiscriminately.

    And best of all, belief in gawd was never an issue, if you did, whatever, if you didn’t, whatever.

  10. avatar says:

    Spanders, I am also interested–with all due respect–to know how you justify cherry-picking the bible?

    So am I…

    But I can guess…it’s called “liberal christianity”…

  11. avatar says:

    Comment from: jshanewhit

    It in no myth. It was a founding theme of our country.

    Since you know this as fact…then please explain why the bible is used in the very courts that claim the myth…?

  12. avatar says:

    Comment from: reason

    point out one verse that says the gov’t of usa and church should be mixed.

    Hmmm…I know you’re not kidding…are you asking for a verse from the bible that mentions the USA?

    you are commanded to practice your faith not rub it in peoples faces.do you agree or disagree with this reading of the scripture.

    How about being a bit more specific…?

  13. avatar reason says:

    phreedm
    when i talk about faith being rubbed in folks faces i don’t me you personally.we are inundated by religon in this country but how much is true belief.i think the difference between you and i is that i suspect that many are faking it.that preacher caught in bristol with whiskey offered to perform oral sex on a policeman don’t tell me he hasn’t been a phoney.

  14. avatar reason says:

    phreedm
    i agree that this nation has a christian cultural heritage and that we should honor it but the founders who belonged to christian churchs on purpose created a secular republic.secular doesn’t mean no religion it just means the public square is neutral.we mix religion/state and we will and up like lebanon,iraq,yugoslavia i don’t want us to become another killing field.

  15. avatar GodFree&Glad says:

    phreedm,

    You can call it “liberal christianity” or whatever you choose to call whatever you believe, but it is clear to me that your “liberal christianity” is exactly the thing that has been going on for untold ages. You believe what you think the bible says, the catholics believe what they think it says, the baptists believe what they think it says, the church of christ group believes what they think it says and on and on right down to the snake handlers. Of course that word “believe” should be changed to “know” because every derned one of you KNOWS you’ve intrepreted it correctly. And most of you believe that it’s your way and anybody else is doomed to hell.

    I would think it would scare the pants off of you–knowing how vengeful your god can be when he isn’t in the ‘god is love’ mode–for fear that maybe you’ve made that one fatal misintrepretation somewhere along the way. Or to put it another way, maybe your brand of “liberal christianty” isn’t right on the money. Oh well, it’s your hell, you burn in it.

  16. avatar says:

    Comment from: reason

    secular doesn’t mean no religion it just means the public square is neutral.

    I totally agree…the public square is neutral…not a vacuum meant to be void of any religious expression…

  17. avatar says:

    Comment from: reason

    i think the difference between you and i is that i suspect that many are faking it.

    There are imposters in any walk of life…

    How many times have I heard that churches are full of hypocrites…?
    Yes and…? What did you expect to find…?

    Matt. 9-12

    We’re all hyporites…both believers and non-believers…it’s human nature…

  18. avatar says:

    Comment from: GodFree&Glad

    I would think it would scare the pants off of you–knowing how vengeful your god can be when he isn’t in the ‘god is love’ mode–for fear that maybe you’ve made that one fatal misintrepretation somewhere along the way. Or to put it another way, maybe your brand of “liberal christianty” isn’t right on the money. Oh well, it’s your hell, you burn in it.

    Not at all…it’s called “Grace”.

    Now as for different denominations believing in different things…

    Got any examples to discuss…?

  19. avatar Ren says:

    Placenta,

    Now as for different denominations believing in different things…

    Got any examples to discuss…?

    Why yes, I just happen to have an example right here:

    If anyone got their hopes high after Mark Noll?s book, Is the Reformation Over?, the answer is now officially ?No!? Yesterday the Pope re-affirmed the RCC teaching that those who have lost connection with apostolic succession and authority have disconnected themselves also from the true Church. Which means that low church Protestants like me are not really in a ?church.? Instead we are ?ecclesial communities.?

    http://www.jesuscreed.org/?p=2568

  20. avatar karen says:

    Ren

    Just when IS the Pope going to start handling snakes, anyway, I wonder? ;)

  21. avatar Ren says:

    Karen,
    He already does, only he doesn’t call them snakes, he calls them Cardinals.

  22. avatar DVanWechel says:

    Phreedm,

    We’re all hypocrites

    Speak for yourself.

    ..it’s human nature…

    Made precisely in the image of your God, eh?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.