That’s right. On July 26 to 29, 2007 in Milwaukee, WI, the Neocon wing nuts held a memorial for the Christian Terrorist Paul Hill complete with re-enactment of his crime:
Saturday, July 28Early am – abortion mill demonstration10:00 am ? Public preaching11:00 am ? Re-enactment11:30 am ? News conference12:00 pm ? Parade12:30 pm ? Pizza in the parkEvening ? Picnic tba
Okay, so there is no end to the craziness of these Neocon theocratic wing nuts. They have declared war on secular America and are spilling the blood of innocent doctors. I know their position, but it doesn’t alter the fact that these medical professionals murdered by Christian terrorists like Hill and Rudolph were engaged in legal activities that is responsible for stopping the butchering of innocent girls and women by supplying them with professional medical care. It is totally indefensible for the Neocon theocratic wing nuts to hold celebrations to memorialize murderers. So who is for pizza in the park with your favorite homegrown religious domestic terrorist?Peter Nuhn
And remember, Hitler was their (christians, the church) man until he wanted to unify the church under government direction.
Also, in my local news (Green Bay, WI), a 10 month old girl was raped at a church daycare… allegedly.
Hey, did you see the money skills of the San Diego church? Wow! At least god forgives. Memo to church/christians:god does not forgive idiots.
We must always remember to use the T-word when referring to Christian terrorists. Never shy away from it. Hammer it home.
Christian Terrorists are numerous and dangerous. Our worst enemy is those Christians who support them.
Gee, I’d go just to check out the “abortion mill demonstration.” Sounds like a lovely family event. The assassination re-enactment is icing on the cake.
I live in WI. It’s supposed to be a pretty liberal state, but there are so many goddamn churches…
Not sure how much good it would do, but I just sent the following email to the host of this site:
Well,suppose someone shows up to shoot them all with red paint balls.Could that be considered part of a reinactment? Sadly,I guess not.
It seems like I get all of my interesting content these days from http://www.freakgirl.com/blog. On her site she had a link to this video asking how much jail time should women who get illegal abortions get. I thought the responses were interesting (might not be the best for work, but there’s NO profanity or nudity):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk6t_tdOkwo
Most of the people who believe that abortion is murder also support the death penalty. So, logically, those people would say that women who have abortions, and their doctors, should get the death penalty.
Nice point Rusty. Makes a mockery of the assumed term “Pro-life”.
It’s not about who lives or dies, it’s about who lives or dies with my say so. Remember these people also don’t support assisted suicide or a families right to take a loved one off life support occording to their wishes. Why should they get to make the decisions I’m the one who’s in control here, Bwaaahaaaaaaaaa.
The “pro lifers” also are against stem cell research. Little kids suffering and dying from conditions which could be cured through stem cell therapy just don’t seem to matter as much as a clump of undifferentiated cells to these scientifically ignornant bastards. “Pro life” indeed.
Is “Picnic tba” code for strap TNT to oneself, walk into an abortion clinic and self distruct.
Funny how the trolls are staying away from this one.
Sorry but I had to bring this up from another topic — Apparently there is a gene that controls left handedness.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6923577.stm
With Christians like these who needs “Islamofascists”?
Funny how we invade other nations in order to fire out terrorists, when we have plenty of them here at home.
I wonder what percentage of non belivers are left handed. I am left handed, anyone else here.
A gene for left-handedness? Well whattaya know!
Yeah, another lefty here!
Finally! Now we can work to eradicate the sinful left handed sinners from our midst for it is surely a sign of demonic influence. (in the Middle Ages people believed this). Now if we could just isolate those pesky gay genes…
Funny you ask, been looking into biological causes for homosexuality under the Harry Potter thread.
I’m left-handed too.
Hmmm…
I don’t write left-handed, but play many sports left-handed.
I had a drama/English teacher once who sad he was left handed but the catholic nuns who taught him would hit him if he didn’t use his right hand.
He now uses his right hand, but his handwriting is atrocious
I’m lefty, I write with my left hand and my handwriting is still atrocious.
I’m a righty, but only in handedness.
I know people are going to jump all over me for saying this but…
Christian whack-jobs who murder abortion providers are not terrorists. The reason why they murder these doctors is because they believe that they are justifiably killing a guilty person. Terrorists indiscriminately target whomever in order to intimidate a larger group.
You may say that other doctors are intimidated by these actions, and I’m sure they are, but that’s true to an extent for all crime. For example, in every major city there are areas where people fear walking down their own street because of the crime that goes on in their neighborhood. But by and large the street thugs who perpetrate that crime are not terrorists.
If you want to call them terrorists though because of the fear they inspire, then the definition of the word terrorism would be so broad as to be meaningless.
I do want to make clear that I in no way sympathize with people who murder abortion providers, and I condemn they’re actions in the strongest possible terms. It’s just a major pet peeve of mine that whenever anyone does anything bad then their labeled as terrorists, whether or not the label actually fits.
Somehow calling them murderers isn’t enough. I don’t get it.
Wow, I messed up a they’re/their twice in the second to last paragraph. Embarrassing.
Apple
I think their intention is to kill as retaliation for abortions performed as well as to intimidate other abortion providers. Why on earth would you think that this is not the case?
ALERT
july 17 the president signed executive order 13438-blocking property of certain persons who threaten stabilization efforts in iraq.
it goes on, in one section refers to persons underming efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in iraq.
the persons in question are american citizens.in effect if you disagree with administration policy on iraq they can take you property with no judicial or legislative review.the burden is on you to get your property back no one can help you because then they are at jeopardy of losing their property.
pardon the pun but god help us 1984 is here.i didn’t print the whole order its scary though ,look it up and beware of what you say and do.
Fear is definitely part of the goal of these actions. There is a fanaticism as well involved. They are using illegal means to stop a legal practice on what they perceive as, moral grounds. But, technically Apple is right they are not terrorist. Terrorism refers to a specific kind of attack that is designed to make everyone fear, all the time. When they start bombing buildings or even neighborhoods nearby. They are then being indiscriminate in the methodology. I am sure there are those in the movement that fit the profile and maybe even planning such broad attacks. But the methods so far are to disrupt(bomb threats), picket, and occasionally punish an individual.
jshanewhit wrote
From Webster
This definition doesn’t refer to “everyone” or “all the time”. No group or individual would meet the definition if it did.
What:
That definition isn’t particularly enlightening though. It uses terror” in the definition, so it still leaves open the question of what “terror” is.
My impression of what a terrorist is, is someone who kills (or otherwise harms) indiscriminately. I don’t think Paul Hill et al. fit the bill.
But then again perhaps my feeling of what terrorism is doesn’t jibe with the majority opinion. And that would make me wrong, even if I still believe my definition of terrorism is more useful as a word and concept than a broader sense of the term.
Unfortunately it’s not up to me
I do feel like the words “terror”, “terrorism”, and “terrorist” are evolving, and it would be interesting to see how the senses of these words have changed over the years (if indeed they have). I’m certainly not the one to do that kind of research though.
Apple,
I disagree. I think people like Paul Hill and Eric Rudolph are terrorists because their actions are intended to inspire terror in abortion providers, as well as to “defend the unborn.” It’s like the 9/11 terrorists; they sought both to kill Americans and to terrorize Americans they did not kill.
I was thinking the same thing as Rusty. Terrorism is used as a means to strike fear in a group (or groups) of people. I’m sure this nut job struck fear in abortion doctors everywhere (or at least heightened their fear).
Apple
You say that you don’t believe Hill or Rudolph are terrorists because they conducted murder. The pro-forced pregnancy people do not just engage in murder though. They also hound the little children of doctors in their schools, they terrorize medical personnel at their homes, they conduct arson and bombings and then plant anti-personnel bombs to go off when police and fire rescue show up for the first instance. Yes Apple, these are all examples of Christian Terrorists, whether you are peeved or not.
Sick people. Did anyone notice that they named all the fetuses with biblical names?
No doubt the Mormons will try to baptize them (the fetuses).
Apple, don’t forget that Paul Hill and Eric Rudolph also inspired to strike terror into the hearts of every pregnant woman (and man [pregnant by proxy]). That way these xian terrorists would have succeded in the abolition of abortion by using terror.
I was there. Photos and comments on my blog:
http://heraldblog.blogspot.com/
Heraldblog
Nice blog you’ve got there. I left a comment.