Comments on: New Infant Mortality Rates Show Lack of Morality in America http://atheists.org/blog/2007/06/21/new_infant_mortality_rates_show_lack_of A Blog of Atheist Thought Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:05:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rdmiller3 http://atheists.org/blog/2007/06/21/new_infant_mortality_rates_show_lack_of/comment-page-1#comment-61300 rdmiller3 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-61300 Look at the majority of people.<br /> <br /> Since when is "more people" supposed to be a moral ideal? Look at the majority of people.

Since when is “more people” supposed to be a moral ideal?

]]> By: TXatheist http://atheists.org/blog/2007/06/21/new_infant_mortality_rates_show_lack_of/comment-page-1#comment-61301 TXatheist Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-61301 This is where I come unglued on issues, the poor. I can only speak for the typical Texan but these SOB would rather pay 5% less in taxes than improve our education system or decrease the percentage of uninsured Texas children. They usually have a great excuse too, like they need a new F-350 or a fishing boat. This is where I come unglued on issues, the poor. I can only speak for the typical Texan but these SOB would rather pay 5% less in taxes than improve our education system or decrease the percentage of uninsured Texas children. They usually have a great excuse too, like they need a new F-350 or a fishing boat.

]]> By: TXatheist http://atheists.org/blog/2007/06/21/new_infant_mortality_rates_show_lack_of/comment-page-1#comment-61302 TXatheist Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-61302 And the word sociali sm makes them rear back as they link that to big government instead of coordinated effort to make sure all citizens have basic humans needs. And the real sad part is some of these Texans think that bringing a kid into bad conditions will "learn them parents to make better choices". Thanks Dave, as much as I get irritated by selfish people I love to get this stuff out in the air to expose the greed of my fellow Texans. (The word sociali sm contains ciali* and that is bad word on the naughty list) And the word sociali sm makes them rear back as they link that to big government instead of coordinated effort to make sure all citizens have basic humans needs. And the real sad part is some of these Texans think that bringing a kid into bad conditions will “learn them parents to make better choices”. Thanks Dave, as much as I get irritated by selfish people I love to get this stuff out in the air to expose the greed of my fellow Texans. (The word sociali sm contains ciali* and that is bad word on the naughty list)

]]> By: reedbraden http://atheists.org/blog/2007/06/21/new_infant_mortality_rates_show_lack_of/comment-page-1#comment-61303 reedbraden Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-61303 When are we going to stop kidding ourselves and move on to full-out sociali$m. Democratic government with a sociali$tic economy isn't necessarily an oxymoron just because Truman threw a hissy fit about it being so. Why every American I've ever met seems to think otherwise is beyond me. It worked well for Tony Blair.<br /> <br /> We already know our current system is trash when it comes to decision-making and providing for the people, so we shouldn't be so brainwashed into thinking we're #1 to start trying new things. When are we going to stop kidding ourselves and move on to full-out sociali$m. Democratic government with a sociali$tic economy isn’t necessarily an oxymoron just because Truman threw a hissy fit about it being so. Why every American I’ve ever met seems to think otherwise is beyond me. It worked well for Tony Blair.

We already know our current system is trash when it comes to decision-making and providing for the people, so we shouldn’t be so brainwashed into thinking we’re #1 to start trying new things.

]]> By: bud http://atheists.org/blog/2007/06/21/new_infant_mortality_rates_show_lack_of/comment-page-1#comment-61304 bud Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-61304 gee pete. hope i'm not being dense here, but "christian nation"? ain't the situation you've described here precicely what a christian nation does "because" it "is" a christian nation???? gee pete. hope i’m not being dense here, but “christian nation”? ain’t the situation you’ve described here precicely what a christian nation does “because” it “is” a christian nation????

]]>