adobe photoshop training cleveland ohio Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 best place to download adobe photoshop layer effects adobe photoshop 8.0 Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended best place to download adobe photoshop 5.0 le mac adobe photoshop advanced artistry tutorials Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection best place to download adobe photoshop 7 01 adobe photoshop classes 92084 Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium best place to download adobe photoshop crack download adobe photoshop cs win Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 best place to download adobe's photoshop

Union of Concerned Scientists Create Unique Guide

"A to Z Guide to Political Interference in Science"Follow the link to the title of this post to view the interactive “A to Z Guide” pictured above. The Union of Concerned Scientists has produced a wonderful interactive chart that documents all the ways the current Administration has interfered with Science. I ask any scientist out there reading this who has not already signed up, please sign the Union of Concerned Scientists’ — Scientists Call to Action: Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking.Peter Nuhn

33 Responses to “Union of Concerned Scientists Create Unique Guide”

  1. avatar Apple_Christmas says:

    I think phreedm’s larger point about Mars is that sometimes planets warm up without any assistance from humans at all (which is certainly true).

    Of course that doesn’t mean that humans haven’t been a factor here on Earth. Phreedm’s just pointing out the possibility that Earth would have warmed up anyway.

    (And I’m neither agreeing nor disagreeing with phreedm. Just trying to clarify what I think his point was.)

  2. avatar Phreedm Is A Dumbass says:

    Phreedm said: [Why are all of the "Global Warming" fanatics all Liberals...?]

    Here’s another question, asswhole. “Why are all of the ‘Buybull-Bashing Christo-fascits’ conservatives?”

    I awaite your answer, Cretin.

  3. avatar DD Dropout says:

    So lets say there is only a 1% chance that humans are making a difference to the climate that will result in a catastrophe.

    How much should we be willing to spend while we are unsure of the risk? Why don’t we just do a bunch of experiments and find out?

    Oh, there’s only one test tube to do the experiment in? Oops!

    Seems humans are not very rational when it comes to accepting a guaranteed short term pain in order to avoid the risk of a very large long term loss.

    Perhaps the reason conservatives are more set against reducing CO2 emissions is that they see the industries involved as theirs. Profits will indeed be impacted strongly.

    Never mind that several bad old polluters have actually found ways to make more money from the stuff they were used to just dumping in the past.

    The climate of the planet has varied greatly from what has benefitted humans so well over the last few millenia. One climate scientist has published a hypothesis that we would already be in an ice age, if it hadn’t been for the methane produced in early agriculture.

    If we can keep the conditions on the earth favourable to us, it would behoove us to do so. Once the test tube has been sterilised, we won’t get a second chance.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.