<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What makes us a religion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:02:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: johnhattan</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51584</link>
		<dc:creator>johnhattan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51584</guid>
		<description>No atheist group has ever split over some minor doctrinal difference or personality conflict!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh. . .wait a minute.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(note: the previous snarky joke was not a jab at any atheist/humanist/whatever group or person in particular. I&#039;ve seen it happen a half-dozen times, and find the trend amusing and sometimes disheartening. Bloody splitters.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No atheist group has ever split over some minor doctrinal difference or personality conflict!</p>
<p>Oh. . .wait a minute.</p>
<p>(note: the previous snarky joke was not a jab at any atheist/humanist/whatever group or person in particular. I&#8217;ve seen it happen a half-dozen times, and find the trend amusing and sometimes disheartening. Bloody splitters.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51586</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51586</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The word, religion, is derived from the Latin religio, meaning bond or obligation. The question, then, is whether humanism demands some kind of bond similar to that required by religion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The word &quot;woman&quot; is derived from the Old English &quot;wifman,&quot; linking the concept of &quot;wife&quot; (wif) to that of &quot;person&quot; or &quot;human being&quot; (man).  The question, then, is whether one can be a woman if one isn&#039;t the wife of a human being.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Just a pet peeve -- arguing from etymology is fallacious.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The word, religion, is derived from the Latin religio, meaning bond or obligation. The question, then, is whether humanism demands some kind of bond similar to that required by religion.</p></blockquote>
<p>
The word &#8220;woman&#8221; is derived from the Old English &#8220;wifman,&#8221; linking the concept of &#8220;wife&#8221; (wif) to that of &#8220;person&#8221; or &#8220;human being&#8221; (man).  The question, then, is whether one can be a woman if one isn&#8217;t the wife of a human being.</p>
<p>[Just a pet peeve -- arguing from etymology is fallacious.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spanders</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51590</link>
		<dc:creator>spanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51590</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Christian wannabe Unitarians have never declared hostilities against those whiny crybaby Ethical Unionists.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I&#039;m not sure I understand this. Can you clarify its meaning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Christian wannabe Unitarians have never declared hostilities against those whiny crybaby Ethical Unionists.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand this. Can you clarify its meaning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JONBOY</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51591</link>
		<dc:creator>JONBOY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51591</guid>
		<description>Calling Atheism a religion is like saying bald is a hair colour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling Atheism a religion is like saying bald is a hair colour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrant Prince</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51593</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrant Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51593</guid>
		<description>The key difference is that (H)umanism denies the supernatural.  Without supernaturalism of some form, virtually no movement, organization, cult, or group is considered by common understanding to be a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Universal Unitarianism does not explicitly disavow that supernaturalism is a possibility; many of their members openly declare belief in a deity.  UU is a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humanist Manifesto III (American Humanist Association) opens with this paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Humanism is a progressive philosophy of life that, without supernaturalism, affirms our ability&lt;br /&gt;
and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal&lt;br /&gt;
fulfillment that aspire to the greater good&lt;br /&gt;
of humanity.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note the SPECIFIC disavowal of supernaturalism, right off the bat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Council for Secular Humanism is likewise explicit in its disavowal of supernaturalism.  Free Inquiry Magazine carries on its inside front cover &quot;The Affirmations of Humanism&quot;, and this is the 2nd Affirmation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;We deplore efforts to denigrate human intelligence, to seek to explain the world in supernatural terms, and to look outside nature for salvation.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humanism is explicity atheistic in its rejection of supernaturalism in any and all forms.  Given supernaturalism to be a necessary component of religious belief systems in general, atheism is NOT a religion, a fortiori neither is Humanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key difference is that (H)umanism denies the supernatural.  Without supernaturalism of some form, virtually no movement, organization, cult, or group is considered by common understanding to be a religion.</p>
<p>Universal Unitarianism does not explicitly disavow that supernaturalism is a possibility; many of their members openly declare belief in a deity.  UU is a religion.</p>
<p>Humanist Manifesto III (American Humanist Association) opens with this paragraph:</p>
<p>&#8220;Humanism is a progressive philosophy of life that, without supernaturalism, affirms our ability<br />
and responsibility to lead ethical lives of personal<br />
fulfillment that aspire to the greater good<br />
of humanity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note the SPECIFIC disavowal of supernaturalism, right off the bat.</p>
<p>The Council for Secular Humanism is likewise explicit in its disavowal of supernaturalism.  Free Inquiry Magazine carries on its inside front cover &#8220;The Affirmations of Humanism&#8221;, and this is the 2nd Affirmation:</p>
<p>&#8220;We deplore efforts to denigrate human intelligence, to seek to explain the world in supernatural terms, and to look outside nature for salvation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Humanism is explicity atheistic in its rejection of supernaturalism in any and all forms.  Given supernaturalism to be a necessary component of religious belief systems in general, atheism is NOT a religion, a fortiori neither is Humanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrant Prince</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51594</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrant Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51594</guid>
		<description>P.S.  I don&#039;t claim to be an authority on religion, so if anyone here on this blog can point me to an accepted/acknowledged &quot;religion&quot; that is, by doctrine, entirely free of supernaturalism, I&#039;d appreciate the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  I don&#8217;t claim to be an authority on religion, so if anyone here on this blog can point me to an accepted/acknowledged &#8220;religion&#8221; that is, by doctrine, entirely free of supernaturalism, I&#8217;d appreciate the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrant Prince</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51595</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrant Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51595</guid>
		<description>P.S.  I don&#039;t claim to be an authority on religion, so if anyone here on this blog can point me to an accepted/acknowledged &quot;religion&quot; that is, by doctrine, entirely free of supernaturalism, I&#039;d appreciate the info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  I don&#8217;t claim to be an authority on religion, so if anyone here on this blog can point me to an accepted/acknowledged &#8220;religion&#8221; that is, by doctrine, entirely free of supernaturalism, I&#8217;d appreciate the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexatheist</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51597</link>
		<dc:creator>alexatheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51597</guid>
		<description>I thought the article was arguing that humanism, not atheism, was a religion.  The two things are not the same and indeed there are religious humanists but there can not be such a thing as a religious atheist (no matter what atheist &quot;jews&quot; believe about themselves).  &lt;br /&gt;
I think that many religionists see the world through god coloured glasses and can&#039;t grasp what it is like to remove those glasses so they can only understand atheism as a belief system from a religious point of view.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the article was arguing that humanism, not atheism, was a religion.  The two things are not the same and indeed there are religious humanists but there can not be such a thing as a religious atheist (no matter what atheist &#8220;jews&#8221; believe about themselves).  <br />
I think that many religionists see the world through god coloured glasses and can&#8217;t grasp what it is like to remove those glasses so they can only understand atheism as a belief system from a religious point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 666</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51599</link>
		<dc:creator>666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51599</guid>
		<description>Celebrant Prince beat me to the punch (again).  Humanism is a philosophy not a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
I thought it interesting that the author of the article claimed to be agnostic since Humanism rejects the supernatural.  Seems as though he might be a little conflicted in what he adheres to.  My little brain tells me that all humanists are atheists by definition, but heat not all atheists are humanists.  No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrant Prince beat me to the punch (again).  Humanism is a philosophy not a religion.<br />
I thought it interesting that the author of the article claimed to be agnostic since Humanism rejects the supernatural.  Seems as though he might be a little conflicted in what he adheres to.  My little brain tells me that all humanists are atheists by definition, but heat not all atheists are humanists.  No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brocktice</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2007/01/18/what_makes_us_a_religion/comment-page-1#comment-51601</link>
		<dc:creator>brocktice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Unknown, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51601</guid>
		<description>Celebrant Prince: Maybe Zen (particularly Zen, that is) Buddhism, but it doesn&#039;t specifically disavow supernaturalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does encourage people to investigate their experiences, and not to take things as a given, so it can be antagonistic to blind faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrant Prince: Maybe Zen (particularly Zen, that is) Buddhism, but it doesn&#8217;t specifically disavow supernaturalism.</p>
<p>It does encourage people to investigate their experiences, and not to take things as a given, so it can be antagonistic to blind faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
