<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax the Church!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2006/03/06/tax_the_church/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2006/03/06/tax_the_church</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexgator1</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2006/03/06/tax_the_church/comment-page-1#comment-29250</link>
		<dc:creator>alexgator1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-29250</guid>
		<description>This is especially true when religious institutions become involved in politics.&lt;br /&gt;
Alex.&lt;br /&gt;
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is especially true when religious institutions become involved in politics.<br />
Alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mryder66</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2006/03/06/tax_the_church/comment-page-1#comment-29253</link>
		<dc:creator>mryder66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-29253</guid>
		<description>Playing devil&#039;s advocate, I think there&#039;s a difference between the churches that are run as businesses and those that meet in someone&#039;s basement.  Where to draw the line, I do not know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m all for taxing Big Religion, but less comfortable with placing a burden on those small groups that want to explore their peculiar mysticisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playing devil&#8217;s advocate, I think there&#8217;s a difference between the churches that are run as businesses and those that meet in someone&#8217;s basement.  Where to draw the line, I do not know.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for taxing Big Religion, but less comfortable with placing a burden on those small groups that want to explore their peculiar mysticisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mxracer652</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2006/03/06/tax_the_church/comment-page-1#comment-29254</link>
		<dc:creator>mxracer652</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-29254</guid>
		<description>HNZ,&lt;br /&gt;
If the primary purpose of said building &amp; property is superstition, and people give money to said person leading the pack, tax it.  It&#039;s a business like everything else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it&#039;s more like a book club, in somebody&#039;s basement, who pays their fair share of burden, and no one is making monetary donations, I say leave it alone.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, what I say should happen is that a new church tax be implemented, and all money raised be added to the NSF&#039;s budget.  That would benefit humanity more than singing songs by pretty glass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HNZ,<br />
If the primary purpose of said building &amp; property is superstition, and people give money to said person leading the pack, tax it.  It&#8217;s a business like everything else.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s more like a book club, in somebody&#8217;s basement, who pays their fair share of burden, and no one is making monetary donations, I say leave it alone.  </p>
<p>Now, what I say should happen is that a new church tax be implemented, and all money raised be added to the NSF&#8217;s budget.  That would benefit humanity more than singing songs by pretty glass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mryder66</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2006/03/06/tax_the_church/comment-page-1#comment-29257</link>
		<dc:creator>mryder66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-29257</guid>
		<description>MX,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just imagine:  All those mega churches  sending a portion of their unholy income to a science fund.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thought alone is giving me a warm feeling inside :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MX,</p>
<p>Just imagine:  All those mega churches  sending a portion of their unholy income to a science fund.</p>
<p>The thought alone is giving me a warm feeling inside <img src='http://atheists.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynic</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2006/03/06/tax_the_church/comment-page-1#comment-29258</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-29258</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure an open library catering towards atheists isn&#039;t on the same general level as a bake sale...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But yes, they should be taxed like everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure an open library catering towards atheists isn&#8217;t on the same general level as a bake sale&#8230;</p>
<p>But yes, they should be taxed like everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

