We had 4 very busy threads dedicated to this book, and now the Movie comes out soon, and it’s all abuzz. There is a movement from the Catholics to boycott the movie, and that makes me want to see it even more!
We had 4 very busy threads dedicated to this book, and now the Movie comes out soon, and it’s all abuzz. There is a movement from the Catholics to boycott the movie, and that makes me want to see it even more!
Callign someone stupid will lead you knowhere and CERTAINLY won’t make the person you are debating adhere to your point of view.
You want to other person to change his mind? Use logical, clear arguments. Use proofs. Use your mind!
Like Asimov said, violence is the last refuge of the weak.
Phisical as well as verbal violence I might add.
Hairless & Karen, where do I put my dollar to keep this show going? ;-p
Always refreshing.
sword-strike:
“Always refreshing”?!
My screen is steamed up…I’m not sure if it’s on the inside or my side!
sword
Where to put your dollar? Well, praying seems to make $ end up in Hairless’s shorts, so you could try that…or make a donation to Amer.Atheists!
Peach
You want in on this? Remember, He’s half my age, I could use a hand, or two.
Hairless
I got taken away from the computer again earlier…
You’re making me into something I could never live up to! I adore you, sweetheart, but really, it sounds like the bottle’s almost empty.
Damn time difference. I hope you’re sleeping it off!
Best bitch ever born? Yeah-I’ll cop to that ‘un. But “The femme fatale of all possible futures…” What ARE you drinking?
Nevermind, keep on. The drunker you get, the better I’ll look, baby.
you said the bees knees !!!!!!!!
hahahahaa
Well, Reluctant, let’s look at how you’ve acted.
1) You bragged about being oh so mature.
Problem is, that was out of one side of your mouth, while out of the other side of your mouth you called me an asshole and essentially said you wanted to knock my block off. Not to mention your original whining like a little punk ass bitch.
You’re immature … very immature. Mere words should not invoke rage in a person, making them want to smash in the other guy’s face. You’re mental. Seek help immediately.
2) You said you were a humanist and acted like you cared so much about others feelings.
Problem is, that was out of one side of your mouth, while out of the other side of your mouth you called me an asshole and essentially said you wanted to knock my block off. Not to mention your original whining like a little punk ass bitch.
Some humanist. You never did show me where the humanist “guidebook to life” shows that one should want to pummel another person’s face, especially when the other person in no way physically threatened you. Got that quote yet Reluctant, old buddy, old pal?
Oh, I almost forgot.
1) I’m sorry.
2) I’m sorry.
3) I’m sorry.
4) I’m sorry.
5) I’m sorry.
There, now I’ve apologized more times than you have.
I figure since you want to get into a pissing match about everything … how many times someone has apologized, who has been in jail the most, etc. … I’d outpiss you on this one. Let me guess … now you want to pound my face in again!
DNA, are you okay? I’m a little worried about you. Well, if you want to talk, I’m happy to listen.
This from the guy who bragged about how mature he was. This from the guy who boasted about how much empathy, he, the caring humanist, has for others.
And despite Reluctant?s implication, nowhere did I beat up on a 15 year old. The person I cussed at was Reluctant Atheist(DS – snip).
And I did not do, nor did I imply ,any physical threat to anyone. (snip)
The ONLY person who implied physical threat to another person here was our own extremely mature, oh so wonderful humanist, Reluctant Atheist!
LOL! In the very post he boasts about being oh-so mature and adult, he acts like a punk ass teenager who can?t control his temper.
Nowhere did I in any way threaten Reluctant, but he wants knock my block off. Reluctant Atheist is mental. He needs to seek professional help immediately.
This is one example of Reluctant saying one thing out of one side of his mouth, while the other side of his mouth says the complete opposite.
More maturity dripping from our great leader?s person, who boasts of how mature he is, and how he?s such an adult.
And then the pot calls the kettle black. The person here who is scary is RELUCTANT ATHEIST. He?s the one who can?t control his temper, and wants to pound in the head of the other guy. Nowhere did I lose it like that. Reluctant is mental. He needs to seek professional help immediately.
Oh yeah, almost forgot.
1) I?m sorry.
2) I?m sorry.
3) I?m sorry.
4) I?m sorry.
5) I?m sorry.
There, that makes 10 times, I think, that I have apologized.
DNAunion:
I’m going to take my own advice:
Words only have the power you give them.
So we’re done.
Reluctant wanted to see one of his mixed ?let bygones by bygones? ? here?s one.
If he?s going to apologize, he should just apologize. Leave all the ?on the proviso that my hand doesn?t get bitten off? crap out of it.
PS: Here we Reluctant once again pointing out how mature he sees himself to be. Maybe I should just go around proclaiming myself to be oh-so mature ? yeah, that?s the ticket!
And here?s his first apology, which also is a kind of example of his ?left half of his mouth saying one thing and his right side saying something else?.
How is that any more sincere than when I said to him something like ?I apologize, but you were acting like a whiney little bitch?.
I mean, if someone is going to apologize, they are supposed to JUST apologize ? not apologize and then immediately turn around and blame the other guy or reinstate your charge against him.
And then, Mr. Dripping With Maturity (that?s you Reluctant) distorts one of my posts to make it look like I said something I didn?t, to push blame off of him and onto me. Which I pointed out.
And then later Mr. Maturity has the balls to say that I stuffed words into HIS mouth? What an asswipe!
DNA
You really are behaving like the fighter who just refuses to go back to his corner, even with 10 referees pulling and pushing and trying to persuade you.
What is wrong?
It feels like it has to be something more than a battle of egos with RA.
Talk to us, please.
Okay, if there are no more responses, this should do it for me.
1) The ONLY person to essentially threaten someone else physically was Reluctant Atheist, not me.
2) I offered TONS of anti-Christian facts in this thread: Reluctant Atheist didn’t do squat.
3) Instead of arguing the Atheist-Theist points, Reluctant Atheist devoted post after post to whining and riding my ass.
4) Reluctant Atheist is a hypocrite. He boasted, more than once, of being oh-so mature and such an adult … yet his actions clearly contradicted his clearly distorted view of himself.
5) Reluctant Atheist stuffed words into my mouth: which I have documented. Then later, had the nerve to accuse me of doing that to him.
There Reluctant, I think that should do it. Unless someone else wants this to continue.
1) I apologize. But you were acting like a whiney little bitch, who couldn’t control his temper.
2) I apologize. But you were acting like a whiney little bitch, who couldn’t control his temper.
3) I apologize. But you were acting like a whiney little bitch, who couldn’t control his temper.
4) I apologize. But you were acting like a whiney little bitch, who couldn’t control his temper.
And I thought that old feud between me and jcc was bad. This whole thread is utterly disgusting. And depressing.
And as far as I’m concerned, this blog is finished.
DNA,
You already apologized many times. RA read your posts so just end it.
r4d
“And as far as I’m concerned, this blog is finished.”
As in HOW? You going to pack your saddle bags and ride off into the sunset, never to be seen again?
Cos of this one thread? Or the new job keeping you too busy?
No. NOPE. Sorry. Can’t let ya do it.
Besides, you still have to tell us about how your sis-in-law is doing.
DNA,
Would you SHUT UP already? Reluctant stopped talking to you a long time ago. You’re basically just screaming into empty air now, and it’s rather annoying. It’s like the kid who keeps mumbling insults to his parents after they’ve punished him and thrown him in his room. Except everybody can still hear you. You’re not adding anything to the conversation. You’ve repeated yourself countless times. The real battle ended with the first apology, but you’ve kept this imaginary battle going ever since. It’s seriously been 200 posts since we stopped caring.
Karen was right, you’re like the fighter who won’t stop going after his opponent, long after the match has ended. Maybe this will help:
DING. DING. DING.
Okay, it looks like some people here don’t want this to end. Fine with me.
No, but thanks for asking.
Actually, as I said, I WAS done … UNLESS SOMEONE ELSE RESPONDED. And guess what … YOU did!
Dude, look up a few posts and you will see that Reluctant posted to me just TONIGHT … in fact, just 27 minutes prior to my last post.
Maybe next time you might want to check your facts before opening your yapper.
1) And you think you’re helping matters? How exactly?
2) And no one said you had to read my posts, now did they.
Oh, but YOU are?!?! No, all you are doing is DRAGGING THIS OUT EVEN MORE!
And, as I pointed out already, I added TONS of factual material to this thread, unlike Reluctant Atheist, who instead of dealing with the real issues, devoted post after post to riding my ass when I first started posting in this thread. Or did you miss that?
200? Really? Then you stopped caring a long time before before I started posting!
And, uhm, why single me out?
1) Reluctant Atheist is the ONLY one who physically threatened anyone.
Gee, maybe I should have pointed this fact out MORE times, since you and others apparently haven’t read it.
2) Reluctant Atheist is the ONLY one who bragged about how mature he was, but then called me an asshole and turned into a hormone-driven teenager who wanted to bash my head in. In fact, he did some of that in the very same post he boasted about being so mature!
Do you want me to post this MORE TIMES? Did you not see it before?
Of course, I could list more, but you can just scroll up a few posts to see them.
Now, once again, I am done … UNLESS SOMEONE RESONDS.
So, are YOU done now?
DNA… please, for the sake of SANITY, would you PLEASE give it a rest. You sound like a jilted lover.
Okay, now HairlessMonkeyDK has responded. So I’ll keep going.
I decided to go back and look at my first 20 posts. Here’s a brief summary of who they were directed at and how long they were.
1) Jesus_Rocks
118 words
597 characters
2) Reluctant Atheist
13 words
64 characters
3) Jesus_Rocks
70 words
379 characters
4) Reluctant Atheist (I messed up on using blockquotes so posted this one multiple times)
134 words
587 characters
5) Jesus_Rocks
340 words
1589 characters
6) Jesus_Rocks
752 words
3732 characters
7) Jesus_Rocks
391 words
1634 characters
566 words
2743 characters
9) Jesus_Rocks
90 words
443 characters
10) Jesus_Rocks
508 words
2218 characters
11) Jesus_Rocks
101 words
424 characters
12) Jesus_Rocks
365 words
1771 characters
13) Jesus_Rocks
720 words
3263 characters
14) Jesus_Rocks
373 words
1517 characters
15) Jesus_Rocks
189 words
875 characters
16) Reluctant Atheist
13 words
62 characters
17) Jesus_Rocks
1319 words
6266 characters
18) Jesus_Rocks
273 words
1333 characters
19) Jesus_Rocks
194 words
935 characters
20) Jesus_Rocks
1049 words
5013 characters
And here?s a post count for Reluctant Atheist, across the same span of posts, as to how many posts he made with and without mentioning me: griping at or about me.
Mentioned/griped at or about me: 9
Didn?t mention/gripe at or about me: 6
So, for Reluctant Atheist, 9 out of 15 of his posts in that time window mentioned/griped about me. That?s 60%!
Now for me, just 2 out of 20 posts in that time window mentioned/griped about Reluctant Atheist. That?s only 10%, and both of those where were reactions to Reluctant Atheist?s griping about me.
I didn?t do a word count for Reluctant Atheist’s posts, but I did for mine. And it comes to 160 words in posts, out of 7578 words total in the above posts by me, that were directed at Reluctant Atheist instead of at Christianity/Jesus_Rocks. That?s only about 2.1%.
As the above shows, I did not come here to argue with Reluctant Atheist. I came here to argue against Christianity and its ignorant followers, like Jesus_Rocks. It was Reluctant Atheist’s riding my ass – griping about me like the little whiney bitch he is – that sparked the mutual negative posts between us.
DNA,
Sorry you feel maligned. It happens to us all at times. Is it really worth spending all that time and energy over?
Of course it is your time and energy, and you can spend it however you like.
Dna,
thanks for proving my point.
Now, good night and good luck.
Hey maybe an atheist fight club will spin off from this blog! LOL
I’m going to write a bot that automatically deletes any post containing the phrase ‘little whiney bitch.’
This is actually incredibly amusing. I leave for the night, come back, and DNA’s still going.
First of all, me trying to shut you up IS adding to the conversation, because if you weren’t so bent on getting the last word, somebody else could say something. I’m just trying to get the thread back on track. But the thread is dead now anyways, so I’m gonna split.
You’ll probably want to get in a few more shots, so feel free. Just know this: I won’t be here to read them.
Wow, I just waded through this thread and all I can say is wow. I agree with DNA’s initial statement that got him in trouble. If you are going to blog on this site and make misinformed comments then expect to get the short end of the stick. J_R both your ignorance of science and evolution is evident in this snippit of one of your eariler posts.
You say that you are 15 and in year 12 if this is true and this is the level of science that you have achieved then I feel extremely sorry for you if you are to go on to tertiary studies. You don’t attend a christian school by any chance do you?
Back to the thread, I hope that they don’t deviate from the original storyline too much (hollywood it up).
It’s funny to me that christians are getting all bent out of shape about a work of fiction saying that it is misleading because people take what is written as being 100% true.
Sounds familiar… very familiar I just can’t put my finger on it.
One Touch Facial Waxer
Hair removal guide beauty forum smart search shipping charge low price guarantee security guarantee p…
Focus Dailies 90 Pack Contact Lenses
To get the best deal on Focus Dailies 90 pack Buy Focus Dailies 90 pack contact lenses for $30.95 pe…
I am new to the blog site. For those of you who read the Da Vinci Code or saw the movie, I hope you will look into my new novel, my debut. Titled HUNTING THE KING, it is coming out in March 2008, published by Kunati Books. Check out their web site for a look at the cover and brief blurb. It is about an archaeological expedition into Iraq in search of the remains of Jesus and his illegitimate daughter Hannaniah. Those who thought Da Vinci was controversial will not like Hunting. I wrote it in response to a midwestern prelate who felt he had the power to deny someone access to God if they belonged to any organization he disapproved of. Which basically means a degree in theology from Notre Dame buys you a lot of power. I got my degree in history which shows you how stupid I am. In any case, I felt theneed to respond.
Dan Brown did say it was a work of fiction based on historical events. He did say it was ficiton. I don’t why everyone is so interesting in him, he was the reason why people are starting to see hidden messages in the Bible.Some of these are supposedly reasonally math oriented.