adobe photoshop training cleveland ohio Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 best place to download adobe photoshop layer effects adobe photoshop 8.0 Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended best place to download adobe photoshop 5.0 le mac adobe photoshop advanced artistry tutorials Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection best place to download adobe photoshop 7 01 adobe photoshop classes 92084 Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium best place to download adobe photoshop crack download adobe photoshop cs win Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 best place to download adobe's photoshop

Thanks to my Dad

… who sent this to me. Just for fun. American Atheists does not condone anyone blowing off anyone’s head with a shotgun. We may think about it sometimes…

80 Responses to “Thanks to my Dad”

  1. avatar Peach63 says:

    I did a research paper (many years ago in college) on the Holocaust. I have no doubts as to the number of people who were exterminated. Might not be exactly 11 million, but that figure is close enough. I have also since researched the various claims that either the Holocaust never happened or that the numbers were skewed. I know not only that it happened but also that the numbers were fairly accurate. I have spoken with eyewitnesses – both Holocaust survivors and the Allied invaders who witnessed the death camps.

    I’m no apologist for Israel either, I do not think they have a right to exist, but in regards to the Holocaust that’s neither here nor there.

    I read about Irving’s trial and sentencing in the newspaper with disbelief. While I obviously don’t agree with his views, no one should be imprisoned for expressing a dissenting opinion. Reminds me too much of the Inquisition era.

  2. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    Alex:
    Well, I suppose the vote is in (on the blog, at least).
    Some troubling questions do come to mind:
    What was Irving doing w/Ritchen’s daughter in the elevator? Were they personal friends, or something?

    I am no chemist per se, but was reading 1 of r4d’s links, & I noted something missing (or perhaps it’s just me).
    How long does the residue of Zyclon B last? Is there any deterioration of the residue? Does it last forever?

    r4d correctly points out the 11th hour efforts to hide the evidence, which makes much of the debate a moot point.

    The only way for you to conclusively prove that the numbers were exagerated, would be to get a COMPLETE list of every person who died, & prove that at least 1/2 of them didn’t (if not more).

    I would much prefer to hear from a Jewish historian, who lost people in the atrocities, come up w/your argument to the holocaust. That’s someone I’d listen to, for obvious reasons.

    I agree w/Peach, though: Irving’s imprisonment is a little over the top.

    & yet people like Phelps run free.

  3. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    What was Irving doing w/Ritchen’s daughter in the elevator? Were they personal friends, or something?

    It’s in that Shermer article I posted. Christopher Hitchens is a British journalist and a free speech activist who was trying to give Irving a fare shake, despite the guy’s continuously erratic behavior and contradictions. From the article:

    Yet, after Hitchens hosted a private dinner for Irving at his home, his wife (who left the home at the same time as Irving after dinner) ?rather gravely asked me if I would mind never inviting him again.? Hitchens explained:
    It transpired that, while in the elevator, Irving had looked with approval at my fair-haired, blue-eyed daughter, then five years old, and declaimed the following doggerel about his own little girl, Jessica, who was the same age:

    I am a Baby Aryan
    Not Jewish or Sectarian;
    I have no plans to marry an
    Ape or Rastafarian.

    The thought of Carol and Antonia in a small space with this large beetle-browed man as he spouted that was, well, distinctly creepy.

    This little ditty, which Irving had repeated elsewhere, came back to haunt him in his libel trial. Nevertheless, Hitchens gave Irving one more chance to redeem himself with a post-trial lunch, in which he inquired whether Irving had, as reported in the press, slipped up one day by addressing the judge in the trial not as ?Your Honor? but as ?Mein F?hrer.? Irving explained that it was a simple misunderstanding in which he was quoting slogans from a German rally at which he had spoken, and he happened to look up at the judge at the wrong moment. But when Hitchens later asked Ian Buruma, a fellow journalist who was reporting on the trial for The New Yorker, to look into the matter, Buruma queried Irving in confidence, who confessed to him: ?Actually, I did say it.? In frustration, Hitchens gave up the cause: ?At this point I finally decided that anyone joining a Fair Play for Irving Committee was up against a man with some kind of death wish.?

    http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/archives/2005/05-05-03.html#Enigma

  4. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    r4d:
    Holy crap!

    That’s a hell of a slip to make in a courtroom. Hell of a BIG slip.
    Far more convincing than any of the links.

    I’ve seen Hitchens on the DS. Good man, strong journalist is the impression I received (wrote the book ‘Thomas Jefferson’ if I recall rightly). Don’t agree w/his opinions on the Iwreck war (moot point there).

    Hitchens has an elevator in his home? That’s just a question. Not a big whoop.

    Yeah, I smell (a not-so) hidden agenda there.

  5. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    Hitchens has an elevator in his home?

    Probably some swanky condo in New York or London (or New York and London.) You know them darn city-slickers! ;)

  6. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    How long does the residue of Zyclon B last? Is there any deterioration of the residue?

    Apparently, a long damn time. Click on the link below, scroll down to the 12th image, and read the caption.

    http://fcit.coedu.usf.edu/holocaust/resource/gallery/MAJD3.htm

    I guess they didn’t blow them all up.

  7. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    You know, I’ve been thinking about Alex’s main question of why “German and Austrian governments” supposedly “will not allow a detailed scientific analysis to be undertaken,” and I think I’ve hit upon the answer.

    You see, the more one looks into to this stuff the more it becomes undeniable that the German and Austrian governments have in fact allowed extensive, exhaustively detailed scientific analysis of the evidence as well as countless archeological digs and continuous historical investigations by credible scholars and experts.

    But it is simply not in anybody’s interest to let a known neo-fascist front group in there to conduct its own “analysis” when their agenda is so painfully obvious and they simply can not be trusted to follow scientific guidelines or be honest with the results. Like all psuedohistorians and psuedoscientists, they see what they believe, not the other way around. In other words, they are apologists who will twist the truth as far as possible in order to claim ‘proof’ of their beloved forgone conclusions.

    I can’t really blame the German and Austrian governments for their caution. And citing their reluctance to provide neo-fascists with access to these sites as some sort of ‘evidence’ against the veracity of official history is a blatant argument from ignorance and completely beyond any sliver of rationality.

  8. avatar kestrien says:

    Back to the original topic…

    DitDit:

    “Ahmadinejad is an ass on most matters, and I disagree with his politics, but he had a point when calling for holocaust cartoons. The holocaust cartoons are distasteful, as were the anti-islamic cartoons, but we should give both sides equal treatment.”

    How on earth is it “both sides?”

    How did this cartoon drama end up a double-sided war between the muslims & jews? I’m pretty sure the jews didn’t publish the cartoons, or draw them, nor were they supportive of judaism or israel in any way. Seems to me you should be calling for cartoons mocking the DANES if you want “both sides.”

    I don’t disagree that they have a right to call for whatever the hell type of cartoons they want…I just object to you chiming in with the typical “blame-the-jews-for-whatever-pisses-off-the-muslims rhetoric.”

    Anyway, if you’ve ever seen muslim magazines/newspapers, they publish anti-semetic cartoons all the time (the staple is the jew eating/drinking the blood of the muslim baby).

  9. avatar alexgator1 says:

    RA “I would much prefer to hear from a Jewish historian, who lost people in the atrocities, come up w/your argument to the holocaust”

    Check out http://www.normanfinkelstein.com then. He is a Brooklyn jew who had family in the Polish camps and he is very critical of the holocaust industry and the “facts” pertaining to it. His books make for very interesting reading.

    Also this article explains it better than I can:
    http://www.zundelsite.org/english/basic_articles/nutshell.html

    I just find it hard to believe that the Germans, even though known for their efficency, could gas 26,000 jews per day for eight months to reach a figure of six million. No one is that efficient.
    Alex

  10. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    Alex,

    I just find it hard to believe that the Germans, even though known for their efficency, could gas 26,000 jews per day for eight months to reach a figure of six million. No one is that efficient.

    That is a straw man. The figure of six million is cumulative over the course of the entire war and includes spot executions, mobile death squads, forced labor and starvation, and the various methods employed at death camps including the gas chambers.

    European Jewish population before WWII: 9.5 million

    European Jewish population immediately after WWII: 3.5 million

  11. avatar alexgator1 says:

    And now for something completlet different…

    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/45572

    I love The Onion!

    Alex.

  12. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    r4d:

    The figure of six million is cumulative over the course of the entire war and includes spot executions, mobile death squads, forced labor and starvation, and the various methods employed at death camps including the gas chambers.

    Yeah, the 8 mos. figure sounded plain wrong.
    1 could apply that span of time to the Armenians, Gypsies, homosexuals, etc.
    Hitler started his campaign on his rise to power in 1933, extended to (or up until?) 1945. 12 years is ample time to implement the atrocities.

  13. avatar DitDit says:

    kestrien:

    Perhaps I didn’t state what I meant as clearly as a should have. What I was referring to is the double-standard of having laws prohibiting the defamation of one religion while crying free speech when defaming another.

    In no way did I mean to blame jewish people for anything or to be prejudicial in any way. I was simply referring to the law that exists in many western european countries that prohibits denying the holocaust or expressions of anti-semitism.

    And, to be quite honest, I had no idea that there was any particularly anti-jewish attitude in the muslim world. I knew about the general rejection of other religions by fanatical muslims, but didn’t know they singled out the jewish religion.

  14. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    DitDit:

    And, to be quite honest, I had no idea that there was any particularly anti-jewish attitude in the muslim world.

    The old doctrine of “blood libel,” where jews are said to require the fresh blood of christian babies in order to survive, is alive and well in the middle east (only it is now muslim babies of course.) “Mein Kampf” and “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” are best sellers in Turkey. Holocaust denial is taught as fact in primary schools. The animosity and propensity to demonize competing religions is written into the holy texts of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam alike, and the Middle East will continue to be the heart of sectarian hatred so long as these religions exist.

  15. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    There is a great opt-ed piece from Shermer concerning David Irving’s imprisonment in the LA Times today. From the article:

    Given their disastrous history of being too lenient with fringe political ideologues, it is perhaps understandable that countries such as Germany and Austria have sought to crack down on rabble-rousers whose “hate speech” can and has led to violence and pogroms. In some cases, the slippery slope has only a few paces between calling the Holocaust a “Zionist lie” and the neo-Nazi desecration of Jewish property.

    But,

    Freedom is a principle that must be applied indiscriminately. We have to defend Irving in order to defend ourselves. Once the laws are in place to jail dissidents of Holocaust history, what’s to stop such laws from being applied to dissenters of religious or political histories, or to skepticism of any sort that deviates from the accepted canon?

    No one should be required to facilitate the expression of Holocaust denial, but neither should there be what Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis called the “silence coerced by law ? the argument of force in its worst form.”

    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-shermer22feb22,0,2752813.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions

  16. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    r4d:
    I think you may like this 1. From 1 of Alex’s links:
    http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=142
    Title is: ” Q: What do Iran’s president, chess master Bobby Fischer, Mel Gibson’s father and Norman Finkelstein have in common?
    A: They all eat Wheaties, Breakfast of Champions and…”
    Check it out.

  17. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    RA,

    Yeah, I honestly don’t know what to think of that Finkelstein guy. Chomsky seems to like him. Not that I give a flying rat’s ass what Chomsky thinks, or the New York Post for that matter.

  18. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    r4d:
    Hey, his site’s pretty good, he dissects charges against him at length, debates Schlomo, he seems to be on the up & up. Time will tell.
    Derschowitz (sp?) dislikes him intensely.
    But he discourses on the Palistinean issues quite well.
    We will see.

    a flying rat’s ass

    I’m surprised you don’t have a jpg for that 1.

  19. avatar rainbows4dinosaurs says:

    Here ya go…

    rat's ass

    If you squint, the feet kinda look like wings.

  20. avatar reluctantatheist says:

    r4d:
    ROFLMAO!
    Where are the wings? I squinted (between tears of laughter), they still look like feet.
    Yeesh, I thought this was a FAMILY blog!
    I’m gonna write my congressman about this!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.