<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ewwin wiw be on Baba Wawa!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheists.org/blog/2005/12/16/ewwin_wiw_be_on_baba_wawa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2005/12/16/ewwin_wiw_be_on_baba_wawa</link>
	<description>A Blog of Atheist Thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainbows4dinosaurs</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2005/12/16/ewwin_wiw_be_on_baba_wawa/comment-page-1#comment-18952</link>
		<dc:creator>rainbows4dinosaurs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18952</guid>
		<description>Great. We get to watch the gullibility queen Barbara Walters and a posse of religious leaders gang up on that &#039;evil atheist&#039; Ellen Johnson. Oh, there is one other &#039;skeptic&#039; listed - Susan Blackmore. But I&#039;m afraid with her purple hair and fuzzy thinking (she has a habit of constantly espousing the brilliance of Dawkins&#039; meme theory along with the wonders of Zen meditation in the same breath) she&#039;ll just come off as another New Age goof ball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boy I sure hate television.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But anyway, GOOD LUCK ELLEN!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. We get to watch the gullibility queen Barbara Walters and a posse of religious leaders gang up on that &#8216;evil atheist&#8217; Ellen Johnson. Oh, there is one other &#8216;skeptic&#8217; listed &#8211; Susan Blackmore. But I&#8217;m afraid with her purple hair and fuzzy thinking (she has a habit of constantly espousing the brilliance of Dawkins&#8217; meme theory along with the wonders of Zen meditation in the same breath) she&#8217;ll just come off as another New Age goof ball. </p>
<p>Boy I sure hate television.</p>
<p>But anyway, GOOD LUCK ELLEN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blueflame</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2005/12/16/ewwin_wiw_be_on_baba_wawa/comment-page-1#comment-18953</link>
		<dc:creator>Blueflame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18953</guid>
		<description>I really hope this goes well, but with as many people as it looks like they have scheduled for this, each &quot;guest&quot; will probably only get about a minute of time to speak and probably only on 1 or 2 set questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its a step in the right direction I think, so long as atheists actually get airtime and in an environment that doesn&#039;t set them up to fail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, good luck to ya Ellen!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Blueflame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope this goes well, but with as many people as it looks like they have scheduled for this, each &#8220;guest&#8221; will probably only get about a minute of time to speak and probably only on 1 or 2 set questions.</p>
<p>Its a step in the right direction I think, so long as atheists actually get airtime and in an environment that doesn&#8217;t set them up to fail.</p>
<p>Well, good luck to ya Ellen!</p>
<p>-Blueflame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gently</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2005/12/16/ewwin_wiw_be_on_baba_wawa/comment-page-1#comment-18956</link>
		<dc:creator>gently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18956</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid that I agree with the above. I think Ellen is there as a token and will be pretty much ignored. I saw her once on a TV show and thats what happened to her then.  I think the network doesn&#039;t want to offend the right wingers and the whole show will be a white wash but they can espouse that they were even handed, like FOX. I never heard of Susan Blackmore but if what r4d says is true then I&#039;m sure she was picked for the show to help them debunk thr whole movement. Sounds like she will be the &quot;Burmuda Triangle&quot; of the whole show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid that I agree with the above. I think Ellen is there as a token and will be pretty much ignored. I saw her once on a TV show and thats what happened to her then.  I think the network doesn&#8217;t want to offend the right wingers and the whole show will be a white wash but they can espouse that they were even handed, like FOX. I never heard of Susan Blackmore but if what r4d says is true then I&#8217;m sure she was picked for the show to help them debunk thr whole movement. Sounds like she will be the &#8220;Burmuda Triangle&#8221; of the whole show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dangerman</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2005/12/16/ewwin_wiw_be_on_baba_wawa/comment-page-1#comment-18957</link>
		<dc:creator>Dangerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18957</guid>
		<description>Blueflame said &quot;Its a step in the right direction I think, so long as atheists actually get airtime and in an environment that doesn&#039;t set them up to fail.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it seems to me that we might be walking into another right-wing booby trap. It&#039;s already been pointed out that Ellen will most likely say her piece and then be completely ignored, and Susan Blackmore could have a Pat Robertson effect on us too. Plus with so many believers, the one &quot;skeptic&quot; and the ONE non-believer...the odds dont look very good. At least the buddhists, muslims, baptists, catholics, and xtians can all gang up on us because they at least all believe in a heaven, even if it&#039;s a little different for each of them. It like a fifteen on one-and-a-half debate. The thing that sucks is, we&#039;d be stupid not to take the airtime that people will see all our the country. It will be interesting to see how this affects the &quot;war on atheists&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blueflame said &#8220;Its a step in the right direction I think, so long as atheists actually get airtime and in an environment that doesn&#8217;t set them up to fail.&#8221;</p>
<p>But it seems to me that we might be walking into another right-wing booby trap. It&#8217;s already been pointed out that Ellen will most likely say her piece and then be completely ignored, and Susan Blackmore could have a Pat Robertson effect on us too. Plus with so many believers, the one &#8220;skeptic&#8221; and the ONE non-believer&#8230;the odds dont look very good. At least the buddhists, muslims, baptists, catholics, and xtians can all gang up on us because they at least all believe in a heaven, even if it&#8217;s a little different for each of them. It like a fifteen on one-and-a-half debate. The thing that sucks is, we&#8217;d be stupid not to take the airtime that people will see all our the country. It will be interesting to see how this affects the &#8220;war on atheists&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoostaNH</title>
		<link>http://atheists.org/blog/2005/12/16/ewwin_wiw_be_on_baba_wawa/comment-page-1#comment-18961</link>
		<dc:creator>RoostaNH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-18961</guid>
		<description>I hope they dont change the subject to putting Cwist back in Cwistmas and making it a national weligious holdiay, since Amewica is a Cwistian countwy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they dont change the subject to putting Cwist back in Cwistmas and making it a national weligious holdiay, since Amewica is a Cwistian countwy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

