- Home
- About
- FAQ
- Law & Politics
- Media
- Events
- Press Information
- Christians Take Over Interfaith Army Chapel in Combat Zone
- Press Kit
- 9/11: 'Never Forget' Must Include All Victims
- Atheists Advocate Separation of Church and State at DNC
- Congressman Pete Stark to Speak at 2013 National Convention
- American Atheists Announces 50th Anniversary Logo Design Contest
- American Atheists Announces Harassment Policy for Conventions and Conferences
- American Atheists Jubilant Over Latest Religion Report
- American Atheists Removes Religious Billboards from Charlotte
- Former Pastor Now American Atheists Public Relations Director
- Former Pastor Teresa MacBain New Public Relations Director
- ITALIAN JUDGE LUIGI TOSTI ACQUITTED!
- American Atheists to Protest Bradford County, FL Decalogue on May 19
- Join
- Shop
Supporting Civil Rights for Atheists and the Separation of Church and State
02
Aug
2012
A Biblical View of Marriage: Responding to Chick-Fil-A
For the past two weeks, we’ve been inundated by the rantings of Chick-fil-A's president stating that millions of dollars are donated by the company to anti-gay causes, in order to protect the ‘Biblical view of marriage’. Frankly, I’m tired of hearing it. Chick-fil-A has the right to spend their profits in whatever way they want, but to proclaim that in doing so, their desire is to make sure that a ‘one man-one woman’ idea of marriage is the official Biblical view. Hogwash! If Chick-fil-A wants to make the Biblical view of marriage the law of the land, then let’s look and see what the Bible has to say about marriage.
The creation of marriage is recorded in Genesis 2:23-24: "The man said, ‘this is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called “woman,” for she was taken out of man.’ For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.” According the this scripture, marriage is God’s attempt to fix his mistake. Genesis 2:18 states, “It is not good for man to be alone.” I guess God didn’t realize that Adam might want a little company.
The word “helper” used to describe Eve in Genesis 2:20 means, “to surround, to protect or aid, help.” Eve was created to be his aid and his helper. This means that, from the very beginning of time, women were created to serve men. Forget equal rights, God has spoken and his words say that women are NOT equal. The first element of a Biblical marriage is that a woman is her husband’s servant.
There are several epistles written in the New Testament by the apostle Paul that refer to marriage and how Christians are to operate within the marriage relationship. One such passage is 1 Corinthians chapter 7, and another is Ephesians 5:22-33. When studied together, these two passages provide biblical principles that form a framework for a “God-pleasing” marriage relationship.
The Ephesians passage is especially profound in reference to a successful biblical marriage. "Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior"
There it is again! Women, according to the Bible, are to submit to their husbands. So, if we take this definition from the very pages of the Bible, then the second principle of a Biblical marriage is the right for a man to do with his wife whatever he wants to do. Her only role in life is to submit. The husband wants to abuse his wife; she must submit. He wants to have mistress; she must submit. He wants to keep her locked up in the back room without proper food or water; she must submit. If he wants her to wear a full length dress, head wrap and veil; she must submit. I could go on and on, but the point is clear: a woman doesn’t have any rights in the Biblical view of marriage.
There are so many other passages of Scripture that paint a very clear picture of the ‘Biblical view of marriage’. Consider the following:
The Biblical Definition of marriage is…
- An arranged marriage—Genesis 24:1-4 (and many other passages)
- A levirate marriage (If a man died leaving no male heir, his brother was required to marry his widow and produce children)—Deuteronomy 25:5-10
- A polygamous marriage—1 Kings 11:3 (and many, many other passages)
- Not inter-racial—Deuteronomy 7:14; 1 Corinthians 7:39; 2 Corinthians 6:14
- Filled with sexual prohibitions—no intercourse during menstruation (The woman is unclean. Yet another degradation of women.) —The woman cannot withhold sex from her husband; she has to fulfill his desire for sex when he wants it. (And another example of the Bible’s misogyny)
- Not allowed to be dissolved, i.e. NO DIVORCE—Matthew 5:31-32; Mark 10:2-12; Luke 16:18
- Except when the man wanted to because his wife had become ‘displeasing’ to him—Deuteronomy 24:1-4
- Between a rapist and his victim—Deuteronomy 22:28-29
- An arranged marriage by a slave owner for his slaves—Genesis 24:4
- Can be between brother and sister—How else do you explain where Cain’s wife came from!
- Intended to produce children—Without children a woman was:
- Shamed—a barren woman was looked upon as cursed by God
- Unable to be saved—1 Timothy 2:15
- And on, and on… ad nauseam!
Many will read this article and bring up the old defense, “Those things are from the Old Testament. We are Christians, we follow the New Testament.” Christians love to talk about how Jesus abolished the Old Testament and the horribly offensive parts about slavery, keeping women in their place, killing gays, etc. In fact, he did no such thing.
Let’s listen to Jesus’ own words as recorded in the gospels:
“For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” — Matthew 5:18-19
“It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid.” (Luke 16:17)
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place.” (Matthew 5:17)
“Did not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth the law” (John7:19)
Jesus expects, no demands that every person who claims to be his follower must obey what is written in the Old Testament. You will hear a big ‘AMEN’ from the religious when we’re talking about the Ten Commandments, which is Old Testament teaching, on government property, but when we start defining marriage well…the Old Testament is off limits; outdated; not relevant; a part of the old way of thinking. You can’t have it both ways. Either you believe what the Bible says or you don’t.
I don’t know about you, but I don’t want the Biblical definition of marriage. I prefer marriage to consist of two adults who make a commitment to each other based on love and mutual respect. I’ll take that over a ‘Biblical marriage’ any day.
~Teresa MacBain
Popular content
- American Atheists files suit against IRS (35,816)
- Law (35,556)
- Activism Explained: Why We Do What We Do (34,715)
- A Biblical View of Marriage: Responding to Chick-Fil-A (33,991)
- Local and Affiliates (33,828)
Pages
Popular Today
Get our Website Updates!
Do you want the latest AA news as soon as it happens?
Sign up using the link below and be the first in the know!
American Atheists Visa
Apply for the American Atheists Visa Card
and show your support with every purchase you make!






Comments
" Frankly, I’m tired of
" Frankly, I’m tired of hearing it. Chick-fil-A has the right to spend their profits in whatever way they want"
"I'm tired hearing about how the religious right spends money to actively keep other human beings oppressed in the name of religion"
Ignoring the Old Testament
There is no such thing as a Biblical Literalist. There are those idiots who THINK they are biblical literalists [Fundamentalists]... but in reality, I have yet to meet anyone that believes that the entire bible is literal (that's impossible as the bible contradicts itself and it isn't possible for a sane person to believe that the answer to a question is both yes and no at the same time.) neither do any of them follow all the bible's decrees. How many christians get divorced? How many refuse to stone their children for talking back to them? I don't think you would find many fundies brave enough to defend slavery. I also don't think you find many fornicators and adultresses being stoned. Afterall... if that happened... wouldn't Sarah Palin's daughter be dead now?
Immoral standards for marriage
A lot of people - including the author of this article - like to refer to Adam and Eve as the first couple. But, technically, they were twins. They were made from the same genes and the same body, so they were brother and sister, not 2 separate entities.
None of this matters anyway. It's a waste of time arguing with believers, because no matter how much evidence is put before them, or how unreal the claim, they will stand by their beliefs because they believe they will be avenged in some later life.
As Sam Harris has said, the issue with believers is not life, but death. They don't like the fact that they will not go on after they are dead. It's pure vanity, which they veil in a cloak of humility.
As an atheist, I truly believe that if people realized that this was it, and there was nothing after this life, they would truly behave better and treat their fellow human being with more compassion, dignity and respect.
Just knowing we are a part of a vast and infinite universe that is wonderful and amazing is better than believing in an iron-age being that punishes people for not following his rules.
Pages